- android.gs
- Compare
- Razr 50 Ultra vs Razr 60 Ultra
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra vs Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
What Razr 50 Ultra does better (4) and where Razr 60 Ultra wins (19) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.1Display9.6
5.5Performance8.4
5.7Camera6.6
5.2Battery8.4
6.1Features8.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Razr 50 UltraRazr 60 Ultra
| Razr 50 Ultra | Razr 60 Ultra | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 171.4 mm | 171.5 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 74 mm | = |
| Thickness | 7.1 mm | 7.2 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Weight | 189 g | 199 g | −10 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Razr 50 Ultra better than Razr 60 Ultra?
- Telephoto cameraYes · Razr 60 Ultra: No
- Weight189 g vs 199 g+5%
- Loudspeaker loudness-22.5 LUFS vs -25.5 LUFS+-12%
- Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.8+6%
Why is Razr 60 Ultra better than Razr 50 Ultra?
- AnTuTu score1,140,567 vs 1,831,189+61%
- 3DMark Wild Life Extreme2,567 vs 5,9382.3×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)4,441 vs 6,796+53%
- Wired charging45 W vs 68 W+51%
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
- Battery capacity4,000 mAh vs 4,700 mAh+18%
- RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
- Active use (test)12.1 h vs 15.2 h+26%
- Peak brightness3,000 nits vs 4,500 nits+50%
- CPU frequency3 GHz vs 4.32 GHz+44%
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Razr 50 Ultra: Yes
- Max video4K vs 8K
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 189 g | 199 g |
| Thickness | 7.1 mm | 7.2 mm |
| Height | 171.4 mm | 171.5 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 74 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Silicone polymer | Silicone polymer |
| Ingress protection | IPX8 | IP48 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Gorilla Glass Victus | Gorilla Glass-Keramik |
| Colours | Spring Green (Dill), Midnight Blue (Navy Blazer), Peach Fuzz, Mocha Mousse | Pantone: Rio Red, Scarab, Mountain Trail, Cabaret |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.9″ | 7″ |
| Panel | Foldable LTPO AMOLED | Foldable LTPO AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,224 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,640 px | 2,912 px |
| Pixel density | 413 ppi | 464 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits | 4,500 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,265 nits | 1,489 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.9% | 84.1% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 3 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3 GHz | 4.32 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 735 | Adreno 830 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,140,567 | 1,831,189 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 4,441 | 6,796 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 2,567 | 5,938 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.95" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 2× | 2× |
| Max video | 4K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 120 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,000 mAh | 4,700 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | 12.1 h | 15.2 h |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 68 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 78% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | 15 W | 30 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -22.5 LUFS | -25.5 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | Hello UI |
| Major OS updates promised | 3 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | A |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 49 h |
| Repairability class | — | B |
| Drop resistance class | — | D |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6vsMotorola Razr 50 Ultra7.36.9
vs
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6vsMotorola Razr 50 Ultra6.46.9
vs
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7vsMotorola Razr 50 Ultra6.96.9
vs
Motorola Razr 40 UltravsMotorola Razr 50 Ultra5.06.9
vs
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5vsMotorola Razr 50 Ultra6.86.9
vs
Motorola Razr 50 UltravsTecno Phantom V Fold26.96.5

