android.gs
Compare
Razr 50 Ultra vs Phantom V Fold2

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra vs Tecno Phantom V Fold2

What Razr 50 Ultra does better (14) and where Phantom V Fold2 wins (10) — every spec side by side.

Motorola · 2024Razr 50 Ultra

6.9Score

14 advantages≈ $540

Higher score

Tecno · 2024Phantom V Fold2

6.5Score

10 advantages≈ $440

9.1Display6.3

5.5Performance5.6

5.7Camera5.8

5.2Battery7.0

6.1Features3.2

Dimensions

Size comparison

Razr 50 UltraPhantom V Fold2

	Razr 50 Ultra	Phantom V Fold2	Difference
Height	171.4 mm	159 mm	+12.4 mm
Width	74 mm	140.4 mm	−66.4 mm
Thickness	7.1 mm	6.1 mm	+1 mm
Weight	189 g	249 g	−60 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Razr 50 Ultra better than Phantom V Fold2?

Measured brightness1,265 nits vs 573 nits2.2×
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
Refresh rate165 Hz vs 120 Hz+38%
Active use (test)12.1 h vs 9.6 h+26%
Major OS updates promised3 vs 2+50%
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)4,441 vs 4,327+3%
Weight189 g vs 249 g+32%
4K video frame rate60 fps vs 30 fps2×
4K selfie videoYes · Phantom V Fold2: No
eSIMYes · Phantom V Fold2: No
Pixel density413 ppi vs 388 ppi+6%
Loudspeaker loudness-22.5 LUFS vs -27.1 LUFS+-17%

Why is Phantom V Fold2 better than Razr 50 Ultra?

Battery capacity4,000 mAh vs 5,750 mAh+44%
Wired charging45 W vs 70 W+56%
Storage (base)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
Ultra-wide cameraNo · Razr 50 Ultra: Yes
Screen size6.9″ vs 7.8″+14%
Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 2,000 px+85%
CPU frequency3 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+7%
Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
Thickness7.1 mm vs 6.1 mm+16%
Screen-to-body ratio84.9% vs 88.2%+4%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Motorola Razr 50 Ultra≈ $5406.9	Tecno Phantom V Fold2≈ $4406.5
Design
Weight	189 g	249 g
Thickness	7.1 mm	6.1 mm
Height	171.4 mm	159 mm
Width	74 mm	140.4 mm
Frame	Aluminium	—
Back	Silicone polymer	—
Ingress protection	IPX8	IP54
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx4
Glass protection	Gorilla Glass Victus	—
Colours	Spring Green (Dill), Midnight Blue (Navy Blazer), Peach Fuzz, Mocha Mousse	Karst Green, Rippling Blue
Stylus	—	Yes
Display
Screen size	6.9″	7.8″
Panel	Foldable LTPO AMOLED	Foldable LTPO AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)	Yes	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	2,000 px
Resolution (height)	2,640 px	2,296 px
Pixel density	413 ppi	388 ppi
Refresh rate	165 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	3,000 nits	—
Measured brightness	1,265 nits	573 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	84.9%	88.2%
HDR	Yes	—
Foldable	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3	Mediatek Dimensity 9000+
Chip maker	Qualcomm	MediaTek
Process	4 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	3 GHz	3.2 GHz
GPU	Adreno 735	Mali-G710 MC10
AnTuTu score	1,140,567	1,158,040
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	4,441	4,327
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	2,567	2,559
Memory
RAM	12 GB	12 GB
Storage (max)	512 GB	512 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	512 GB
Storage type	UFS 4.0	—
Memory card slot	No	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.7	f/1.9
Main sensor size	1/1.95"	1/1.3"
Rear cameras	2	3
Optical stabilisation	Yes	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	No	Yes
Telephoto camera	Yes	Yes
Optical zoom	2×	2×
Max video	4K	4K
4K video frame rate	60 fps	30 fps
Selfie camera	32 MP	32 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	No
Battery
Battery capacity	4,000 mAh	5,750 mAh
Active use (test)	12.1 h	9.6 h
Wired charging	45 W	70 W
Charged in 30 min	—	75%
Wireless charging	Yes	Yes
Wireless charging power	15 W	15 W
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	Yes	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 7	Wi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth	5.4	5.3
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C
USB version	2	—
Dual-band GPS	Yes	—
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	-22.5 LUFS	-27.1 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Side	Under display
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launch	Android 14	Android 14
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	—	HiOS 14 Fold
Major OS updates promised	3	2