android.gs
Compare
Razr 40 Ultra vs Razr 60 Ultra

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Motorola Razr 60 Ultra

What Razr 40 Ultra does better (3) and where Razr 60 Ultra wins (19) — every spec side by side.

Motorola · 2023Razr 40 Ultra

5.0Score

3 advantages≈ $300

Motorola · 2025Razr 60 Ultra

9.1Score

19 advantages≈ $540

Higher score

6.5Display9.6

4.1Performance8.4

5.4Camera6.6

3.1Battery8.4

3.5Features8.4

Dimensions

Size comparison

Razr 40 UltraRazr 60 Ultra

	Razr 40 Ultra	Razr 60 Ultra	Difference
Height	170.8 mm	171.5 mm	−0.7 mm
Width	74 mm	74 mm	=
Thickness	7 mm	7.2 mm	−0.2 mm
Weight	184 g	199 g	−14 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Razr 40 Ultra better than Razr 60 Ultra?

Weight184 g vs 199 g+8%
Main camera aperturef/1.5 vs f/1.8+20%
Thickness7 mm vs 7.2 mm+3%

Why is Razr 60 Ultra better than Razr 40 Ultra?

Main camera12 MP vs 50 MP4.2×
AnTuTu score975,461 vs 1,831,189+88%
Wired charging30 W vs 68 W2.3×
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,645 vs 6,796+86%
Water resistance (IPx)IPx2 vs IPx84×
Peak brightness1,400 nits vs 4,500 nits3.2×
Battery capacity3,800 mAh vs 4,700 mAh+24%
Storage (max)512 GB vs 1,024 GB2×
RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
Wireless charging power5 W vs 30 W6×
Measured brightness1,050 nits vs 1,489 nits+42%
CPU frequency3.19 GHz vs 4.32 GHz+35%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Motorola Razr 40 Ultra≈ $3005.0	Motorola Razr 60 Ultra≈ $5409.1
Design
Weight	184 g	199 g
Thickness	7 mm	7.2 mm
Height	170.8 mm	171.5 mm
Width	74 mm	74 mm
Frame	Aluminium	Aluminium
Back	Glass	Silicone polymer
Ingress protection	IP52	IP48
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx2	IPx8
Glass protection	—	Gorilla Glass-Keramik
Colours	Infinite Black, Glacier Blue, Viva Magenta, Peach Fuzz	Pantone: Rio Red, Scarab, Mountain Trail, Cabaret
Display
Screen size	6.9″	7″
Panel	Foldable LTPO AMOLED	Foldable LTPO AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)	Yes	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,224 px
Resolution (height)	2,640 px	2,912 px
Pixel density	413 ppi	464 ppi
Refresh rate	165 Hz	165 Hz
Peak brightness	1,400 nits	4,500 nits
Measured brightness	1,050 nits	1,489 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	85.1%	84.1%
HDR	Yes	Yes
Foldable	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1	Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite
Chip maker	Qualcomm	Qualcomm
Process	4 nm	3 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	3.19 GHz	4.32 GHz
GPU	Adreno 730	Adreno 830
AnTuTu score	975,461	1,831,189
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	3,645	6,796
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	5,938
Memory
RAM	12 GB	16 GB
Storage (max)	512 GB	1,024 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage type	UFS 3.1	UFS 4.0
Memory card slot	No	No
Camera
Main camera	12 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.5	f/1.8
Main sensor size	1/2.55"	1/1.56"
Rear cameras	2	2
Optical stabilisation	Yes	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	No	No
Optical zoom	—	2×
Max video	4K	8K
4K video frame rate	60 fps	120 fps
Selfie camera	32 MP	50 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	3,800 mAh	4,700 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Po
Active use (test)	—	15.2 h
Wired charging	30 W	68 W
Charged in 30 min	—	78%
Wireless charging	Yes	Yes
Wireless charging power	5 W	30 W
Reverse wireless charging	—	Yes
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	Yes	Yes
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6E	Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth	5.3	5.4
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C
USB version	2	2
Dual-band GPS	Yes	—
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	-25.4 LUFS	-25.5 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Side	Side
Barometer	Yes	Yes
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer (USA only)	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
Software
OS at launch	Android 13	Android 15
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	—	Hello UI
Major OS updates promised	3	—
EU label
Energy class	—	A
Battery charge cycles	—	1,000
Endurance per cycle	—	49 h
Repairability class	—	B
Drop resistance class	—	D