- android.gs
- Compare
- Razr 60 Ultra vs Flip 2
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs nubia Flip 2
What Razr 60 Ultra does better (19) and where Flip 2 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.6Display8.0
6.6Camera3.4
8.4Battery3.5
8.4Features4.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Razr 60 UltraFlip 2
| Razr 60 Ultra | Flip 2 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 171.5 mm | 170 mm | +1.5 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 75.5 mm | −1.5 mm |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm | 7 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Weight | 199 g | 214 g | −15 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Razr 60 Ultra better than Flip 2?
- Wired charging68 W vs 33 W2.1×
- RAM16 GB vs 8 GB2×
- Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 256 GB4×
- Optical stabilisationYes · Flip 2: No
- Wireless chargingYes · Flip 2: No
- Refresh rate165 Hz vs 120 Hz+38%
- Battery capacity4,700 mAh vs 4,300 mAh+9%
- CPU frequency4.32 GHz vs 2.5 GHz+73%
- 4K video frame rate120 fps vs 30 fps4×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Flip 2: No
- Max video8K vs 4K
- 4K selfie videoYes · Flip 2: No
Why is Flip 2 better than Razr 60 Ultra?
- Thickness7.2 mm vs 7 mm+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 199 g | 214 g |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm | 7 mm |
| Height | 171.5 mm | 170 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 75.5 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Silicone polymer | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP48 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Glass protection | Gorilla Glass-Keramik | — |
| Colours | Pantone: Rio Red, Scarab, Mountain Trail, Cabaret | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 7″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | Foldable LTPO AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 1,224 px | 1,188 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,912 px | 2,790 px |
| Pixel density | 464 ppi | 439 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,500 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 1,489 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.1% | — |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite | Mediatek Dimensity 7300X |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Mediatek |
| Process | 3 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 4.32 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Mali G615 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,831,189 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 6,796 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 5,938 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | — |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Optical zoom | 2× | — |
| Max video | 8K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 120 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,700 mAh | 4,300 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Active use (test) | 15.2 h | — |
| Wired charging | 68 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 78% | 55% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 30 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -25.5 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | proximity, accelerometer, gyro, light, compass, hall, fingerprint |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Hello UI | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | A | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,000 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 49 h | — |
| Repairability class | B | — |
| Drop resistance class | D | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Motorola Razr 60 UltravsMotorola Razr 50 Ultra9.16.9
vs
Motorola Razr 60 UltravsXiaomi Mix Flip 29.18.7
vs
Motorola Razr 60 UltravsMotorola Razr 40 Ultra9.15.0
vs
Xiaomi Mix FlipvsMotorola Razr 60 Ultra8.19.1
vs
Honor Magic V Flip 2vsMotorola Razr 60 Ultra8.99.1
vs
nubia Flip 2vsSamsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE5.26.2
