- android.gs
- Compare
- Razr 2025 vs Flip 2
Motorola Razr 2025 vs nubia Flip 2
What Razr 2025 does better (10) and where Flip 2 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Razr 2025Flip 2
| Razr 2025 | Flip 2 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 171.3 mm | 170 mm | +1.3 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 75.5 mm | −1.5 mm |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm | 7 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Weight | 188 g | 214 g | −26 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Razr 2025 better than Flip 2?
- Optical stabilisationYes · Flip 2: No
- Wireless chargingYes · Flip 2: No
- Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 4,300 mAh+5%
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Flip 2: No
- 4K selfie videoYes · Flip 2: No
- eSIMYes · Flip 2: No
- Weight188 g vs 214 g+14%
- CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 2.5 GHz+4%
- Charged in 30 min61% vs 55%+11%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 6+8%
Why is Flip 2 better than Razr 2025?
- Wired charging30 W vs 33 W+10%
- Pixel density413 ppi vs 439 ppi+6%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,188 px+10%
- Thickness7.3 mm vs 7 mm+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 188 g | 214 g |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm | 7 mm |
| Height | 171.3 mm | 170 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 75.5 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Silicone polymer | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP48 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Glass protection | Gorilla Glass Victus | — |
| Colours | Pantone: Gibraltar Sea, Spring Bud, Lightest Sky, Parfait Pink | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.9″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | Foldable LTPO AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,188 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,640 px | 2,790 px |
| Pixel density | 413 ppi | 439 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 1,189 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.9% | — |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7400X | Mediatek Dimensity 7300X |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Mediatek |
| Process | 4 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.6 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali G615 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 676,899 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,974 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,020 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.95" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 4,300 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | — |
| Active use (test) | 9.5 h | — |
| Wired charging | 30 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 61% | 55% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 15 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -24.2 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), gyro, accelerometer, proximity, compass, barometer (NA only) | proximity, accelerometer, gyro, light, compass, hall, fingerprint |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Hello UI | — |
