- android.gs
- Compare
- Razr 60 Ultra vs Razr+ 2024
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Motorola Razr+ 2024
What Razr 60 Ultra does better (17) and where Razr+ 2024 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.6Display9.1
8.4Performance5.9
6.6Camera5.7
8.4Battery4.8
8.4Features8.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Razr 60 UltraRazr+ 2024
| Razr 60 Ultra | Razr+ 2024 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 171.5 mm | 171.4 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 74 mm | = |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm | 7.1 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 199 g | 189 g | +10 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Razr 60 Ultra better than Razr+ 2024?
- AnTuTu score1,831,189 vs 1,158,987+58%
- Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 256 GB4×
- Wired charging68 W vs 45 W+51%
- Battery capacity4,700 mAh vs 4,000 mAh+18%
- RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)6,796 vs 5,601+21%
- Peak brightness4,500 nits vs 3,000 nits+50%
- CPU frequency4.32 GHz vs 3 GHz+44%
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Razr+ 2024: No
- Max video8K vs 4K
- 4K video frame rate120 fps vs 60 fps2×
- Wireless charging power30 W vs 15 W2×
Why is Razr+ 2024 better than Razr 60 Ultra?
- Telephoto cameraNo · Razr 60 Ultra: Yes
- Weight199 g vs 189 g+5%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.7+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 199 g | 189 g |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm | 7.1 mm |
| Height | 171.5 mm | 171.4 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 74 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Silicone polymer | Silicone polymer |
| Ingress protection | IP48 | IPX8 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Gorilla Glass-Keramik | — |
| Colours | Pantone: Rio Red, Scarab, Mountain Trail, Cabaret | Midnight Blue, Hot Pink, Spring Green, Peach Fuzz, Paris Hilton Edition |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 7″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | Foldable LTPO AMOLED | Foldable LTPO AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,224 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,912 px | 2,640 px |
| Pixel density | 464 ppi | 413 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,500 nits | 3,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,489 nits | 1,253 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.1% | 84.9% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 4.32 GHz | 3 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Adreno 735 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,831,189 | 1,158,987 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 6,796 | 5,601 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 5,938 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.95" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 2× | 2× |
| Max video | 8K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 120 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,700 mAh | 4,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | 15.2 h | — |
| Wired charging | 68 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 78% | 78% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | 30 W | 15 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -25.5 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Hello UI | Hello UI |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | A | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,000 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 49 h | — |
| Repairability class | B | — |
| Drop resistance class | D | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Motorola Razr 60 UltravsMotorola Razr 50 Ultra9.16.9vs
Motorola Razr 60 UltravsXiaomi Mix Flip 29.18.7vs
Motorola Razr 60 UltravsMotorola Razr 40 Ultra9.15.0
vsXiaomi Mix FlipvsMotorola Razr 60 Ultra8.19.1
vsHonor Magic V Flip 2vsMotorola Razr 60 Ultra8.99.1
vs
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip6vsMotorola Razr+ 20246.47.0