- android.gs
- Compare
- DuraSport UW vs Camon 20 Pro
Kyocera DuraSport UW vs Tecno Camon 20 Pro
What DuraSport UW does better (9) and where Camon 20 Pro wins (17) — every spec side by side.
vs
4.2Display7.2
5.4Camera6.4
4.0Battery6.0
7.6Features4.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
DuraSport UWCamon 20 Pro
| DuraSport UW | Camon 20 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 154.7 mm | 163.4 mm | −8.7 mm |
| Width | 70.7 mm | 76.7 mm | −6 mm |
| Thickness | 9.9 mm | 7.8 mm | +2.1 mm |
| Weight | 185 g | 190 g | −5 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is DuraSport UW better than Camon 20 Pro?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx32.7×
- Wireless chargingYes · Camon 20 Pro: No
- 5GYes · Camon 20 Pro: No
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Camon 20 Pro: No
- Pixel density431 ppi vs 395 ppi+9%
- Weight185 g vs 190 g+3%
- USB version3.1 vs 2+55%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 4+25%
Why is Camon 20 Pro better than DuraSport UW?
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
- RAM4 GB vs 8 GB2×
- Storage (max)64 GB vs 256 GB4×
- OLED panelNo · DuraSport UW: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · DuraSport UW: Yes
- Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+11%
- Main camera48 MP vs 64 MP+33%
- Wired charging27 W vs 33 W+22%
- Storage (base)64 GB vs 256 GB4×
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 32 MP4×
- Dual SIMNo · DuraSport UW: Yes
- CPU frequency2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+10%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 185 g | 190 g |
| Thickness | 9.9 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 154.7 mm | 163.4 mm |
| Width | 70.7 mm | 76.7 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | Shatter-Resistant Glass | — |
| Colours | Black | Predawn Black, Serenity Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.1″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 431 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 500 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.1% | 85.7% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G | Mediatek Helio G99 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 8 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 574,290 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,953 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 64 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.7" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 27 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 38% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 8 W | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3.1 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Rear | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted); unspecified sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 (unlocked) | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HIOS 14 |
