android.gs
Compare
DuraForce Pro 3 vs V29 Pro

Kyocera DuraForce Pro 3 vs Vivo V29 Pro

What DuraForce Pro 3 does better (10) and where V29 Pro wins (17) — every spec side by side.

Kyocera · 2023DuraForce Pro 3

7.1Score

10 advantages≈ $490

Vivo · 2023V29 Pro

8.0Score

17 advantages≈ $500

Higher score

6.0Display9.2

6.3Camera8.4

3.1Battery4.8

9.6Features4.7

Dimensions

Size comparison

DuraForce Pro 3V29 Pro

	DuraForce Pro 3	V29 Pro	Difference
Height	154 mm	164.2 mm	−10.2 mm
Width	75 mm	74.4 mm	+0.6 mm
Thickness	14.5 mm	7.5 mm	+7 mm
Weight	237 g	188 g	+49 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is DuraForce Pro 3 better than V29 Pro?

Wireless chargingYes · V29 Pro: No
NFCYes · V29 Pro: No
Stereo speakersYes · V29 Pro: No
Main camera64 MP vs 50 MP+28%
Memory card slotYes · V29 Pro: No
eSIMYes · V29 Pro: No
3.5 mm headphone jackYes · V29 Pro: No
USB version3.2 vs 2+60%
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 5+30%
Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%

Why is V29 Pro better than DuraForce Pro 3?

Refresh rate60 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
RAM6 GB vs 12 GB2×
Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
Optical stabilisationNo · DuraForce Pro 3: Yes
Telephoto cameraNo · DuraForce Pro 3: Yes
Battery capacity4,270 mAh vs 4,600 mAh+8%
Selfie camera8 MP vs 50 MP6.2×
CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 3.1 GHz+29%
Weight237 g vs 188 g+26%
Screen size5.4″ vs 6.8″+26%
Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
Dual SIMNo · DuraForce Pro 3: Yes

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Kyocera DuraForce Pro 3≈ $4907.1	Vivo V29 Pro≈ $5008.0
Design
Weight	237 g	188 g
Thickness	14.5 mm	7.5 mm
Height	154 mm	164.2 mm
Width	75 mm	74.4 mm
Frame	—	Plastic
Back	—	Glass
Ingress protection	IP68	—
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	—
Glass protection	Shatter-Resistant Glass	—
Colours	Black	Himalayan Blue, Space Black, Pink
Display
Screen size	5.4″	6.8″
Panel	OLED	AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,260 px
Resolution (height)	2,160 px	2,800 px
Pixel density	449 ppi	453 ppi
Refresh rate	60 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	—	1,300 nits
Measured brightness	—	1,029 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	64.7%	90.8%
Performance
Chipset	Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1	Mediatek Dimensity 8200
Chip maker	Qualcomm	MediaTek
Process	4 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.4 GHz	3.1 GHz
GPU	Adreno 644	Mali-G610 MC6
AnTuTu score	—	682,257
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	—	3,999
Memory
RAM	6 GB	12 GB
Storage (max)	128 GB	256 GB
Storage (base)	128 GB	256 GB
Storage type	UFS 2.2	UFS 3.1
Memory card slot	Yes	No
Camera
Main camera	64 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.9
Main sensor size	—	1/1.56"
Rear cameras	2	3
Optical stabilisation	No	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	No	Yes
Optical zoom	—	2×
Max video	4K	4K
4K video frame rate	24 fps	30 fps
Selfie camera	8 MP	50 MP
4K selfie video	No	No
Battery
Battery capacity	4,270 mAh	4,600 mAh
Battery type	Li-Ion	Li-Po
Active use (test)	—	12.1 h
Wired charging	—	80 W
Charged in 30 min	—	83%
Wireless charging	Yes	No
Wireless charging power	8 W	—
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	Yes	No
Dual SIM	No	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6E	Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth	5.2	5.3
NFC	Yes	No
USB	USB Type-C 3.2	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	3.2	2
Dual-band GPS	Yes	—
Satellite navigation	—	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	No
3.5 mm headphone jack	Yes	No
Loudspeaker loudness	—	-30 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Side	Under display
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted); unspecified sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
SAR (head)	—	1.17 W/kg
Software
OS at launch	Android 13	Android 13
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	—	Funtouch 13
Major OS updates promised	—	3