- android.gs
- Compare
- DuraForce Pro 3 vs Phantom X2
Kyocera DuraForce Pro 3 vs Tecno Phantom X2
What DuraForce Pro 3 does better (8) and where Phantom X2 wins (16) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.0Display8.6
6.3Camera9.2
3.1Battery7.8
9.6Features7.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
DuraForce Pro 3Phantom X2
| DuraForce Pro 3 | Phantom X2 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 154 mm | 164.6 mm | −10.6 mm |
| Width | 75 mm | 72.7 mm | +2.3 mm |
| Thickness | 14.5 mm | 8.9 mm | +5.6 mm |
| Weight | 237 g | 203 g | +34 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is DuraForce Pro 3 better than Phantom X2?
- Wireless chargingYes · Phantom X2: No
- Stereo speakersYes · Phantom X2: No
- Memory card slotYes · Phantom X2: No
- eSIMYes · Phantom X2: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Phantom X2: No
- Pixel density449 ppi vs 387 ppi+16%
- USB version3.2 vs 2+60%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 5+30%
Why is Phantom X2 better than DuraForce Pro 3?
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
- Battery capacity4,270 mAh vs 5,160 mAh+21%
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationNo · DuraForce Pro 3: Yes
- RAM6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
- 4K video frame rate24 fps vs 60 fps2.5×
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 32 MP4×
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 3.05 GHz+27%
- Screen size5.4″ vs 6.8″+26%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Dual SIMNo · DuraForce Pro 3: Yes
- Weight237 g vs 203 g+17%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 237 g | 203 g |
| Thickness | 14.5 mm | 8.9 mm |
| Height | 154 mm | 164.6 mm |
| Width | 75 mm | 72.7 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Glass protection | Shatter-Resistant Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Colours | Black | Stardust Gray, Moonlight Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 5.4″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | OLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,160 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 449 ppi | 387 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Measured brightness | — | 710 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 64.7% | 93.3% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 | Mediatek Dimensity 9000 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 3.05 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 644 | Mali-G710 MC10 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 973,623 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 4,027 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 24 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,270 mAh | 5,160 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | — |
| Wired charging | — | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 81% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 8 W | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -26.8 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted); unspecified sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | HiOS 8.6 |
