- android.gs
- Compare
- GT Neo 5 240W vs Phantom X2
Realme GT Neo 5 240W vs Tecno Phantom X2
What GT Neo 5 240W does better (9) and where Phantom X2 wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.3Display8.6
8.6Camera9.2
6.8Battery7.8
8.1Features7.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
GT Neo 5 240WPhantom X2
| GT Neo 5 240W | Phantom X2 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.9 mm | 164.6 mm | −0.7 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 72.7 mm | +3.1 mm |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 8.9 mm | = |
| Weight | 199 g | 203 g | −4 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is GT Neo 5 240W better than Phantom X2?
- Wired charging240 W vs 45 W5.3×
- RAM16 GB vs 8 GB2×
- Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 256 GB4×
- Stereo speakersYes · Phantom X2: No
- Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
- Charged in 30 min375% vs 81%4.6×
- Pixel density451 ppi vs 387 ppi+17%
- CPU frequency3.19 GHz vs 3.05 GHz+5%
- Resolution (width)1,240 px vs 1,080 px+15%
Why is Phantom X2 better than GT Neo 5 240W?
- Battery capacity4,600 mAh vs 5,160 mAh+12%
- Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
- Selfie camera16 MP vs 32 MP2×
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.7+12%
- Screen-to-body ratio87.9% vs 93.3%+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 199 g | 203 g |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 8.9 mm |
| Height | 163.9 mm | 164.6 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 72.7 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Colours | Purple, Black, White | Stardust Gray, Moonlight Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,240 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,772 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 451 ppi | 387 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,400 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | — | 710 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87.9% | 93.3% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | Mediatek Dimensity 9000 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.19 GHz | 3.05 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Mali-G710 MC10 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 973,623 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 4,027 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | — |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,600 mAh | 5,160 mAh |
| Wired charging | 240 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 375% | 81% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -26.8 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | realme UI 4.0 | HiOS 8.6 |
