- android.gs
- Compare
- Phantom X2 vs iQOO Neo 7
Tecno Phantom X2 vs Vivo iQOO Neo 7
What Phantom X2 does better (9) and where iQOO Neo 7 wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.6Display8.1
7.0Performance7.6
9.2Camera7.9
7.8Battery7.8
7.1Features8.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Phantom X2iQOO Neo 7
| Phantom X2 | iQOO Neo 7 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.6 mm | 164.8 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Width | 72.7 mm | 76.9 mm | −4.2 mm |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 8.6 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Weight | 203 g | 193 g | +10 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Phantom X2 better than iQOO Neo 7?
- Battery capacity5,160 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+3%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)4,027 vs 3,292+22%
- Rear cameras3 vs 13×
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · iQOO Neo 7: No
- 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 30 fps2×
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
- Screen-to-body ratio93.3% vs 87.6%+7%
- Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.8+6%
Why is iQOO Neo 7 better than Phantom X2?
- Wired charging45 W vs 120 W2.7×
- AnTuTu score973,623 vs 1,241,266+27%
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Stereo speakersNo · Phantom X2: Yes
- Charged in 30 min81% vs 150%+85%
- Weight203 g vs 193 g+5%
- Thickness8.9 mm vs 8.6 mm+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 203 g | 193 g |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 8.6 mm |
| Height | 164.6 mm | 164.8 mm |
| Width | 72.7 mm | 76.9 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | — |
| Colours | Stardust Gray, Moonlight Silver | Interstellar Black, Frost Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 387 ppi | 388 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,300 nits |
| Measured brightness | 710 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 93.3% | 87.6% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9000 | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.05 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G710 MC10 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| AnTuTu score | 973,623 | 1,241,266 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 4,027 | 3,292 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 1,790 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.97" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,160 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 120 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 81% | 150% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -26.8 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | HiOS 8.6 | Funtouch 13 |
