- android.gs
- Compare
- Play 60 Plus vs Hot 50 Pro 4G
Honor Play 60 Plus vs Infinix Hot 50 Pro 4G
What Play 60 Plus does better (7) and where Hot 50 Pro 4G wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.1Display8.8
4.1Camera4.6
8.0Battery6.0
5.5Features4.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
Play 60 PlusHot 50 Pro 4G
| Play 60 Plus | Hot 50 Pro 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 167 mm | 167 mm | = |
| Width | 76.8 mm | 76.4 mm | +0.4 mm |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 7.4 mm | +0.7 mm |
| Weight | 197 g | 190 g | +7 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Play 60 Plus better than Hot 50 Pro 4G?
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 256 GB2×
- 5GYes · Hot 50 Pro 4G: No
- Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+20%
- Wired charging35 W vs 33 W+6%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Process4 nm vs 6 nm+50%
Why is Hot 50 Pro 4G better than Play 60 Plus?
- Peak brightness850 nits vs 1,800 nits2.1×
- OLED panelNo · Play 60 Plus: Yes
- NFCNo · Play 60 Plus: Yes
- Pixel density261 ppi vs 393 ppi+51%
- Weight197 g vs 190 g+4%
- Selfie camera5 MP vs 8 MP+60%
- Resolution (width)720 px vs 1,080 px+50%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.6+12%
- Thickness8.1 mm vs 7.4 mm+9%
- Bluetooth5 vs 5.4+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 197 g | 190 g |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 7.4 mm |
| Height | 167 mm | 167 mm |
| Width | 76.8 mm | 76.4 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Colours | Green, Black, White | Sleek Black, Titanium Grey, Glacier Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | TFT LCD | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,610 px | 2,436 px |
| Pixel density | 261 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 850 nits | 1,800 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.9% | 86.1% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 | Mediatek Helio G100 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 613 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 562,039 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,992 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.6 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.8" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 5 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 35 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 56% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.4 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass, proximity (ultrasonic) | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 8.0 | XOS 14.5 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 1 |
Related comparisons
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13vsInfinix Hot 50 Pro 4G6.76.7
vs
Samsung Galaxy A16 5GvsInfinix Hot 50 Pro 4G6.76.7
vs
Samsung Galaxy A16vsInfinix Hot 50 Pro 4G6.66.7
vs
Infinix Hot 60 ProvsInfinix Hot 50 Pro 4G7.66.7
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4GvsInfinix Hot 50 Pro 4G6.76.7
vs
Infinix Hot 50 Pro 4GvsInfinix Hot 40 Pro6.76.6

