- android.gs
- Compare
- Hot 50 Pro 4G vs Pova 6 Neo
Infinix Hot 50 Pro 4G vs Tecno Pova 6 Neo
What Hot 50 Pro 4G does better (10) and where Pova 6 Neo wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.8Display6.5
4.4Performance4.4
4.6Camera4.6
6.0Battery8.3
4.2Features4.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
Hot 50 Pro 4GPova 6 Neo
| Hot 50 Pro 4G | Pova 6 Neo | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 167 mm | 168.6 mm | −1.6 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 76.6 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm | 9.2 mm | −1.8 mm |
| Weight | 190 g | 206 g | −16 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Hot 50 Pro 4G better than Pova 6 Neo?
- Peak brightness1,800 nits vs 580 nits3.1×
- OLED panelYes · Pova 6 Neo: No
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx3+33%
- Memory card slotYes · Pova 6 Neo: No
- Weight190 g vs 206 g+8%
- Charged in 30 min56% vs 38%+47%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 4+25%
- Thickness7.4 mm vs 9.2 mm+24%
- Main camera aperturef/1.6 vs f/1.7+6%
- Bluetooth5.4 vs 5.2+4%
Why is Pova 6 Neo better than Hot 50 Pro 4G?
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 7,000 mAh+40%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 190 g | 206 g |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm | 9.2 mm |
| Height | 167 mm | 168.6 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 76.6 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx3 |
| Colours | Sleek Black, Titanium Grey, Glacier Blue | Starry Silver, Speed Black, Comet Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,436 px | 2,460 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 396 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,800 nits | 580 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.1% | 84.5% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G100 | Mediatek Helio G99 Ultimate |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 562,039 | 568,329 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,992 | 1,986 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.8" | — |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 7,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 56% | 38% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | XOS 14.5 | HIOS 15 |
| Major OS updates promised | 1 | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13vsInfinix Hot 50 Pro 4G6.76.7
vsSamsung Galaxy A16 5GvsInfinix Hot 50 Pro 4G6.76.7
vsSamsung Galaxy A16vsInfinix Hot 50 Pro 4G6.66.7
vsInfinix Hot 60 ProvsInfinix Hot 50 Pro 4G7.66.7
vsXiaomi Redmi Note 13 4GvsInfinix Hot 50 Pro 4G6.76.7vs
Infinix Hot 50 Pro 4GvsInfinix Hot 40 Pro6.76.6