- android.gs
- Compare
- Hot 50 Pro 4G vs Redmi Note 13 4G
Infinix Hot 50 Pro 4G vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
What Hot 50 Pro 4G does better (6) and where Redmi Note 13 4G wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.8Display8.4
4.4Performance3.5
4.6Camera7.1
6.0Battery4.2
4.2Features5.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Hot 50 Pro 4GRedmi Note 13 4G
| Hot 50 Pro 4G | Redmi Note 13 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 167 mm | 162.3 mm | +4.7 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 75.6 mm | +0.8 mm |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm | 8 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Weight | 190 g | 188 g | +2 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Hot 50 Pro 4G better than Redmi Note 13 4G?
- AnTuTu score562,039 vs 316,857+77%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,992 vs 1,817+10%
- Main camera aperturef/1.6 vs f/1.8+12%
- Thickness7.4 mm vs 8 mm+8%
- Charged in 30 min56% vs 52%+8%
- Bluetooth5.4 vs 5.1+6%
Why is Redmi Note 13 4G better than Hot 50 Pro 4G?
- Main camera50 MP vs 108 MP2.2×
- Major OS updates promised1 vs 33×
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.8 GHz+27%
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Hot 50 Pro 4G: Yes
- Selfie camera8 MP vs 16 MP2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 190 g | 188 g |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 167 mm | 162.3 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 75.6 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | Sleek Black, Titanium Grey, Glacier Blue | Midnight Black, Mint Green, Ice Blue, Ocean Sunset |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,436 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,800 nits | 1,800 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,313 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.1% | 87.5% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G100 | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 610 |
| AnTuTu score | 562,039 | 316,857 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,992 | 1,817 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 137 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.8" | 1/1.67" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 11.9 h |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 56% | 52% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -25.8 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.77 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | XOS 14.5 | HyperOS 2 |
| Major OS updates promised | 1 | 3 |
