android.gs
Compare
200 Pro vs iQOO 15

Honor 200 Pro vs Vivo iQOO 15

What 200 Pro does better (4) and where iQOO 15 wins (20) — every spec side by side.

Honor · 2024200 Pro

9.1Score

4 advantages≈ $1,150

Vivo · 2025iQOO 15

9.7Score

20 advantages≈ $1,050

Higher score

9.3Display9.6

8.0Performance9.5

8.7Camera9.4

7.6Battery9.7

8.5Features9.7

Dimensions

Size comparison

200 ProiQOO 15

	200 Pro	iQOO 15	Difference
Height	163.3 mm	163.7 mm	−0.4 mm
Width	75.2 mm	76.8 mm	−1.6 mm
Thickness	8.2 mm	8.1 mm	+0.1 mm
Weight	199 g	215 g	−16 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is 200 Pro better than iQOO 15?

Charged in 30 min120% vs 60%2×
Weight199 g vs 215 g+8%
Wireless charging power66 W vs 40 W+65%
Selfie camera50 MP vs 32 MP+56%

Why is iQOO 15 better than 200 Pro?

AnTuTu score1,281,655 vs 2,973,3032.3×
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)4,759 vs 10,4662.2×
Active use (test)11.1 h vs 21.8 h+96%
3DMark Wild Life Extreme2,955 vs 7,2292.4×
Battery capacity5,200 mAh vs 7,000 mAh+35%
Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx8+60%
Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
CPU frequency3 GHz vs 4.6 GHz+53%
Peak brightness4,000 nits vs 6,000 nits+50%
Major OS updates promised4 vs 5+25%
Max video4K vs 8K
4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Honor 200 Pro≈ $1,1509.1	Vivo iQOO 15≈ $1,0509.7
Design
Weight	199 g	215 g
Thickness	8.2 mm	8.1 mm
Height	163.3 mm	163.7 mm
Width	75.2 mm	76.8 mm
Frame	Plastic	Aluminium
Back	Glass	Glass
Ingress protection	IP65	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx5	IPx8
Glass protection	Aluminosilicate glass	—
Colours	Moonlight White, Black, Ocean Cyan, Pink	Alpha, Legend, Gray, Green, Blue, Apex
Display
Screen size	6.8″	6.8″
Panel	OLED	LTPO AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)	—	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,224 px	1,440 px
Resolution (height)	2,700 px	3,168 px
Pixel density	437 ppi	508 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	144 Hz
Peak brightness	4,000 nits	6,000 nits
Measured brightness	1,110 nits	1,313 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	90.8%	90.7%
HDR	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3	Qualcomm SM8850-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
Chip maker	Qualcomm	Qualcomm
Process	4 nm	3 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	3 GHz	4.6 GHz
GPU	Adreno 735	Adreno 840
AnTuTu score	1,281,655	2,973,303
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	4,759	10,466
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	2,955	7,229
Memory
RAM	16 GB	16 GB
Storage (max)	1,024 GB	1,024 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage type	UFS 4.0	UFS 4.1
Memory card slot	No	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.9	f/1.9
Main sensor size	1/1.3"	1/1.56"
Rear cameras	3	3
Optical stabilisation	Yes	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	Yes	Yes
Optical zoom	2.5×	3×
Max video	4K	8K
4K video frame rate	30 fps	60 fps
Selfie camera	50 MP	32 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	5,200 mAh	7,000 mAh
Battery type	Si/C	Si/C
Active use (test)	11.1 h	21.8 h
Wired charging	100 W	100 W
Charged in 30 min	120%	60%
Wireless charging	Yes	Yes
Wireless charging power	66 W	40 W
Reverse wireless charging	Yes	Yes
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	Yes	Yes
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6	Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth	5.3	6
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 3.2
USB version	2	3.2
Video output	—	Yes
Infrared port	Yes	Yes
Dual-band GPS	—	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	-24.7 LUFS	-25 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	Under display, ultrasonic
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, ultrasound proximity	Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launch	Android 14	Android 16
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	MagicOS 8	OriginOS 6
Major OS updates promised	4	5