- android.gs
- Compare
- 200 Pro vs 90 Pro
Honor 200 Pro vs Honor 90 Pro
What 200 Pro does better (10) and where 90 Pro wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
200 Pro90 Pro
| 200 Pro | 90 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.3 mm | 163.8 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Width | 75.2 mm | 74.9 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8.1 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 199 g | 192 g | +7 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 200 Pro better than 90 Pro?
- Peak brightness4,000 nits vs 1,600 nits2.5×
- Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationYes · 90 Pro: No
- Wireless chargingYes · 90 Pro: No
- Battery capacity5,200 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+4%
- Wired charging100 W vs 90 W+11%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)4,759 vs 4,464+7%
- eSIMYes · 90 Pro: No
- 3DMark Wild Life Extreme2,955 vs 2,835+4%
- Charged in 30 min120% vs 112%+7%
Why is 90 Pro better than 200 Pro?
- Main camera50 MP vs 200 MP4×
- AnTuTu score1,281,655 vs 1,463,370+14%
- Weight199 g vs 192 g+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 199 g | 192 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8.1 mm |
| Height | 163.3 mm | 163.8 mm |
| Width | 75.2 mm | 74.9 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP65 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | — |
| Glass protection | Aluminosilicate glass | — |
| Colours | Moonlight White, Black, Ocean Cyan, Pink | Midnight Black, Emerald Green, Diamond Silver, Peacock Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | OLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,224 px | 1,224 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,700 px | 2,700 px |
| Pixel density | 437 ppi | 437 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,000 nits | 1,600 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,110 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.8% | 90.9% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3 GHz | 3 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 735 | Adreno 730 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,281,655 | 1,463,370 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 4,759 | 4,464 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 2,955 | 2,835 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.3" | 1/1.4" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 2.5× | 2.5× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,200 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | 11.1 h | — |
| Wired charging | 100 W | 90 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 120% | 112% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 66 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -24.7 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, ultrasound proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, ultrasound proximity |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 8 | MagicOS 7.1 |
| Major OS updates promised | 4 | — |
