android.gs
Compare
200 Pro vs 400 Pro

Honor 200 Pro vs Honor 400 Pro

What 200 Pro does better (5) and where 400 Pro wins (15) — every spec side by side.

Honor · 2024200 Pro

9.1Score

5 advantages≈ $1,150

Honor · 2025400 Pro

9.5Score

15 advantages≈ $630

Higher score

9.3Display9.3

8.0Performance8.4

8.7Camera9.5

7.6Battery8.5

8.5Features9.8

Dimensions

Size comparison

200 Pro400 Pro

	200 Pro	400 Pro	Difference
Height	163.3 mm	160.8 mm	+2.5 mm
Width	75.2 mm	76.1 mm	−0.9 mm
Thickness	8.2 mm	8.1 mm	+0.1 mm
Weight	199 g	205 g	−6 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is 200 Pro better than 400 Pro?

Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 512 GB2×
RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
Weight199 g vs 205 g+3%
Wireless charging power66 W vs 50 W+32%
Charged in 30 min120% vs 102%+18%

Why is 400 Pro better than 200 Pro?

Main camera50 MP vs 200 MP4×
AnTuTu score1,281,655 vs 1,902,675+48%
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)4,759 vs 6,552+38%
Active use (test)11.1 h vs 13.9 h+25%
Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx8+60%
3DMark Wild Life Extreme2,955 vs 4,620+56%
Major OS updates promised4 vs 6+50%
Measured brightness1,110 nits vs 1,481 nits+33%
Peak brightness4,000 nits vs 5,000 nits+25%
4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
Optical zoom2.5× vs 3×+20%
Pixel density437 ppi vs 460 ppi+5%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Honor 200 Pro≈ $1,1509.1	Honor 400 Pro≈ $6309.5
Design
Weight	199 g	205 g
Thickness	8.2 mm	8.1 mm
Height	163.3 mm	160.8 mm
Width	75.2 mm	76.1 mm
Frame	Plastic	Plastic
Back	Glass	Glass
Ingress protection	IP65	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx5	IPx8
Glass protection	Aluminosilicate glass	—
Colours	Moonlight White, Black, Ocean Cyan, Pink	Midnight Black, Lunar Grey, Tidal Blue
Display
Screen size	6.8″	6.7″
Panel	OLED	AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,224 px	1,280 px
Resolution (height)	2,700 px	2,800 px
Pixel density	437 ppi	460 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	4,000 nits	5,000 nits
Measured brightness	1,110 nits	1,481 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	90.8%	89.5%
HDR	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3	Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
Chip maker	Qualcomm	Qualcomm
Process	4 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	3 GHz	3 GHz
GPU	Adreno 735	Adreno 750
AnTuTu score	1,281,655	1,902,675
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	4,759	6,552
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	2,955	4,620
Memory
RAM	16 GB	12 GB
Storage (max)	1,024 GB	512 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage type	UFS 4.0	UFS 4.0
Memory card slot	No	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	200 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.9	f/1.9
Main sensor size	1/1.3"	1/1.4"
Rear cameras	3	3
Optical stabilisation	Yes	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	Yes	Yes
Optical zoom	2.5×	3×
Max video	4K	4K
4K video frame rate	30 fps	60 fps
Selfie camera	50 MP	50 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	5,200 mAh	5,300 mAh
Battery type	Si/C	Si/C
Active use (test)	11.1 h	13.9 h
Wired charging	100 W	100 W
Charged in 30 min	120%	102%
Wireless charging	Yes	Yes
Wireless charging power	66 W	50 W
Reverse wireless charging	Yes	Yes
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	Yes	Yes
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6	Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth	5.3	5.4
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	2	2
Infrared port	Yes	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	-24.7 LUFS	-23.4 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	Under display
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, ultrasound proximity	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, compass, proximity (ultrasonic)
Software
OS at launch	Android 14	Android 15
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	MagicOS 8	MagicOS 10
Major OS updates promised	4	6
EU label
Energy class	—	A
Battery charge cycles	—	1,200
Endurance per cycle	—	56 h
Repairability class	—	B
Drop resistance class	—	A