How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. 200 Pro vs Aquos R7s

Honor 200 Pro vs Sharp Aquos R7s

What 200 Pro does better (16) and where Aquos R7s wins (7) — every spec side by side.

Honor 200 Pro
Honor · 2024200 Pro
9.1Score
16 advantages≈ $1,150
Higher score
vs
Sharp Aquos R7s
Sharp · 2023Aquos R7s
8.1Score
7 advantages≈ $1,100
9.3Display8.3
8.7Camera6.8
7.6Battery5.4
8.5Features8.9
Dimensions

Size comparison

200 ProAquos R7s
75.2 × 163.38.277 × 1619.3
200 ProAquos R7sDifference
Height163.3 mm161 mm+2.3 mm
Width75.2 mm77 mm−1.8 mm
Thickness8.2 mm9.3 mm−1.1 mm
Weight199 g208 g−9 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is 200 Pro better than Aquos R7s?

  1. Wired charging100 W vs 27 W3.7×
  2. Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 256 GB4×
  3. Optical stabilisationYes · Aquos R7s: No
  4. Telephoto cameraYes · Aquos R7s: No
  5. Wireless chargingYes · Aquos R7s: No
  6. RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
  7. Battery capacity5,200 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+4%
  8. Rear cameras3 vs 13×
  9. Selfie camera50 MP vs 13 MP4×
  10. Main camera50 MP vs 47 MP+6%
  11. 4K selfie videoYes · Aquos R7s: No
  12. eSIMYes · Aquos R7s: No

Why is Aquos R7s better than 200 Pro?

  1. Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx8+60%
  2. Memory card slotNo · 200 Pro: Yes
  3. Max video4K vs 8K
  4. 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · 200 Pro: Yes
  5. Pixel density437 ppi vs 456 ppi+4%
  6. USB version2 vs 3+50%
  7. Resolution (width)1,224 px vs 1,260 px+3%
Specifications

Side by side

Honor 200 ProHonor 200 Pro≈ $1,1509.1
Sharp Aquos R7sSharp Aquos R7s≈ $1,1008.1
Design
Weight199 g208 g
Thickness8.2 mm9.3 mm
Height163.3 mm161 mm
Width75.2 mm77 mm
FramePlasticAluminium
BackGlassGlass
Ingress protectionIP65IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx5IPx8
Glass protectionAluminosilicate glassCorning Gorilla Glass Victus
ColoursMoonlight White, Black, Ocean Cyan, PinkBlack
Display
Screen size6.8″6.6″
PanelOLEDPRO IGZO OLED
OLED panelYesYes
Resolution (width)1,224 px1,260 px
Resolution (height)2,700 px2,730 px
Pixel density437 ppi456 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness4,000 nits—
Measured brightness1,110 nits—
Screen-to-body ratio90.8%86.3%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
Chip makerQualcommQualcomm
Process4 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3 GHz3 GHz
GPUAdreno 735Adreno 730
AnTuTu score1,281,655—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)4,759—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme2,955—
Memory
RAM16 GB12 GB
Storage (max)1,024 GB256 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.0—
Memory card slotNoYes
Camera
Main camera50 MP47 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.9f/1.9
Main sensor size1/1.3"1"
Rear cameras31
Optical stabilisationYesNo
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesNo
Optical zoom2.5×—
Max video4K8K
4K video frame rate30 fps—
Selfie camera50 MP13 MP
4K selfie videoYesNo
Battery
Battery capacity5,200 mAh5,000 mAh
Battery typeSi/CLi-Ion
Active use (test)11.1 h—
Wired charging100 W27 W
Charged in 30 min120%—
Wireless chargingYesNo
Wireless charging power66 W—
Reverse wireless chargingYes—
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth5.35.2
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 3.0
USB version23
Infrared portYes—
Dual-band GPS—Yes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoYes
Loudspeaker loudness-24.7 LUFS—
Fingerprint sensorUnder displayUnder display, ultrasonic
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, ultrasound proximityFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launchAndroid 14Android 13
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceMagicOS 8—
Major OS updates promised4—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare