android.gs
Compare
Poco F4 GT vs nubia RedMagic 7

Xiaomi Poco F4 GT vs ZTE nubia RedMagic 7

What Poco F4 GT does better (8) and where nubia RedMagic 7 wins (11) — every spec side by side.

Xiaomi · 2022Poco F4 GT

8.5Score

8 advantages≈ $620

ZTE · 2022nubia RedMagic 7

8.7Score

11 advantages≈ $680

Higher score

7.4Display8.1

7.3Performance7.8

8.0Camera7.7

6.8Battery6.6

8.7Features9.0

Dimensions

Size comparison

Poco F4 GTnubia RedMagic 7

	Poco F4 GT	nubia RedMagic 7	Difference
Height	162.5 mm	170.6 mm	−8.1 mm
Width	76.7 mm	78.3 mm	−1.6 mm
Thickness	8.5 mm	9.5 mm	−1 mm
Weight	210 g	215 g	−5 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Poco F4 GT better than nubia RedMagic 7?

Battery capacity4,700 mAh vs 4,500 mAh+4%
Selfie camera20 MP vs 8 MP2.5×
Measured brightness758 nits vs 527 nits+44%
Peak brightness800 nits vs 700 nits+14%
Weight210 g vs 215 g+2%
Pixel density395 ppi vs 387 ppi+2%
Thickness8.5 mm vs 9.5 mm+12%
Screen-to-body ratio86.2% vs 83.6%+3%

Why is nubia RedMagic 7 better than Poco F4 GT?

RAM12 GB vs 18 GB+50%
Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
Refresh rate120 Hz vs 165 Hz+38%
AnTuTu score952,124 vs 1,056,488+11%
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,637 vs 3,855+6%
Max video4K vs 8K
3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Poco F4 GT: Yes
USB version2 vs 3+50%
Loudspeaker loudness-27.4 LUFS vs -22.7 LUFS+-17%
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 6E+8%
Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Xiaomi Poco F4 GT≈ $6208.5	ZTE nubia RedMagic 7≈ $6808.7
Design
Weight	210 g	215 g
Thickness	8.5 mm	9.5 mm
Height	162.5 mm	170.6 mm
Width	76.7 mm	78.3 mm
Frame	Aluminium	Aluminium
Back	Glass	Glass
Glass protection	Corning Gorilla Glass Victus	Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Colours	Stealth Black, Knight Silver, Cyber Yellow	Obsidian, Pulsar, Supernova
Display
Screen size	6.7″	6.8″
Panel	AMOLED	AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	2,400 px	2,400 px
Pixel density	395 ppi	387 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	165 Hz
Peak brightness	800 nits	700 nits
Measured brightness	758 nits	527 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	86.2%	83.6%
HDR	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1	Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
Chip maker	Qualcomm	Qualcomm
Process	4 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	3 GHz	3 GHz
GPU	Adreno 730	Adreno 730
AnTuTu score	952,124	1,056,488
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	3,637	3,855
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	2,471	—
Memory
RAM	12 GB	18 GB
Storage (max)	256 GB	512 GB
Storage (base)	128 GB	128 GB
Storage type	UFS 3.1	UFS 3.1
Memory card slot	No	No
Camera
Main camera	64 MP	64 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.9	f/1.8
Main sensor size	1/1.73"	1/1.97"
Rear cameras	2	2
Optical stabilisation	No	No
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	No	No
Max video	4K	8K
4K video frame rate	60 fps	60 fps
Selfie camera	20 MP	8 MP
4K selfie video	No	No
Battery
Battery capacity	4,700 mAh	4,500 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	Li-Po
Wired charging	120 W	120 W
Charged in 30 min	176%	176%
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	No	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6	Wi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth	5.2	5.2
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 3.0
USB version	2	3
Video output	—	Yes
Infrared port	Yes	—
Dual-band GPS	Yes	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	Yes
Loudspeaker loudness	-27.4 LUFS	-22.7 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Side	Under display
Barometer	—	Yes
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
SAR (head)	0.59 W/kg	—
Software
OS at launch	Android 12	Android 12
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	HyperOS 2	Redmagic 5.0