- android.gs
- Compare
- Poco F4 GT vs nubia RedMagic 7S
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT vs ZTE nubia RedMagic 7S
What Poco F4 GT does better (7) and where nubia RedMagic 7S wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.4Display8.4
8.0Camera7.7
6.8Battery6.6
8.7Features9.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Poco F4 GTnubia RedMagic 7S
| Poco F4 GT | nubia RedMagic 7S | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.5 mm | 170.6 mm | −8.1 mm |
| Width | 76.7 mm | 78.3 mm | −1.6 mm |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 9.5 mm | −1 mm |
| Weight | 210 g | 215 g | −5 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Poco F4 GT better than nubia RedMagic 7S?
- Battery capacity4,700 mAh vs 4,500 mAh+4%
- Selfie camera20 MP vs 8 MP2.5×
- Peak brightness800 nits vs 700 nits+14%
- Weight210 g vs 215 g+2%
- Pixel density395 ppi vs 387 ppi+2%
- Thickness8.5 mm vs 9.5 mm+12%
- Screen-to-body ratio86.2% vs 83.6%+3%
Why is nubia RedMagic 7S better than Poco F4 GT?
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 165 Hz+38%
- RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
- Max video4K vs 8K
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Poco F4 GT: Yes
- CPU frequency3 GHz vs 3.19 GHz+6%
- USB version2 vs 3+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 6E+8%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 210 g | 215 g |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 9.5 mm |
| Height | 162.5 mm | 170.6 mm |
| Width | 76.7 mm | 78.3 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | — |
| Colours | Stealth Black, Knight Silver, Cyber Yellow | Black, Gray |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 387 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 165 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 800 nits | 700 nits |
| Measured brightness | 758 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.2% | 83.6% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3 GHz | 3.19 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 730 |
| AnTuTu score | 952,124 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,637 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 2,471 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.73" | 1/1.97" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 20 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,700 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 120 W | 120 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 176% | 176% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 3 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -27.4 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.59 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | HyperOS 2 | RedMagic OS 5.5 |
