- android.gs
- Compare
- X80 Pro vs X90 Pro+
Vivo X80 Pro vs Vivo X90 Pro+
What X80 Pro does better (4) and where X90 Pro+ wins (5) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
X80 ProX90 Pro+
| X80 Pro | X90 Pro+ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.6 mm | 164.4 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Width | 75.3 mm | 75.3 mm | = |
| Thickness | 9.1 mm | 9.7 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Weight | 215 g | 221 g | −6 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X80 Pro better than X90 Pro+?
- Optical zoom5× vs 3.5×+43%
- Weight215 g vs 221 g+3%
- Main camera aperturef/1.6 vs f/1.8+12%
- Thickness9.1 mm vs 9.7 mm+7%
Why is X90 Pro+ better than X80 Pro?
- Peak brightness1,500 nits vs 1,800 nits+20%
- Measured brightness1,014 nits vs 1,123 nits+11%
- CPU frequency3.05 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+5%
- Charged in 30 min79% vs 91%+15%
- USB version3.1 vs 3.2+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 215 g | 221 g |
| Thickness | 9.1 mm | 9.7 mm |
| Height | 164.6 mm | 164.4 mm |
| Width | 75.3 mm | 75.3 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Eco leather |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Schott Xensation Up | — |
| Colours | Cosmic Black, Blue, Orange | Black, Red |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | LTPO3 AMOLED | LTPO4 AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,440 px | 1,440 px |
| Resolution (height) | 3,200 px | 3,200 px |
| Pixel density | 517 ppi | 517 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,500 nits | 1,800 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,014 nits | 1,123 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.9% | 90% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.05 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 730 Mali-G710 MC10 | Adreno 740 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 1,869,058 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 5,153 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 3,688 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.3" | 1" |
| Rear cameras | 4 | 4 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 5× | 3.5× |
| Max video | 8K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,700 mAh | 4,700 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 80 W | 80 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 79% | 91% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | 50 W | 50 W |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 (Global)/ 3.2 (China) | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| USB version | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| Video output | — | Yes |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -25.1 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display, ultrasonic | Under display, ultrasonic |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Funtouch 14 (Global) | Funtouch (Global) |
