- android.gs
- Compare
- X60 Pro vs X80 Pro
Vivo X60 Pro vs Vivo X80 Pro
What X60 Pro does better (4) and where X80 Pro wins (16) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
X60 ProX80 Pro
| X60 Pro | X80 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 158.6 mm | 164.6 mm | −6 mm |
| Width | 73.2 mm | 75.3 mm | −2.1 mm |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 9.1 mm | −1.5 mm |
| Weight | 179 g | 215 g | −36 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X60 Pro better than X80 Pro?
- Weight179 g vs 215 g+20%
- CPU frequency3.2 GHz vs 3.05 GHz+5%
- Thickness7.6 mm vs 9.1 mm+20%
- Main camera aperturef/1.5 vs f/1.6+7%
Why is X80 Pro better than X60 Pro?
- Wired charging33 W vs 80 W2.4×
- Optical zoom2× vs 5×2.5×
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Wireless chargingNo · X60 Pro: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · X60 Pro: Yes
- Battery capacity4,200 mAh vs 4,700 mAh+12%
- Main camera48 MP vs 50 MP+4%
- Pixel density398 ppi vs 517 ppi+30%
- Measured brightness818 nits vs 1,014 nits+24%
- Max video4K vs 8K
- Process7 nm vs 4 nm+75%
- Screen size6.6″ vs 6.8″+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 179 g | 215 g |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 9.1 mm |
| Height | 158.6 mm | 164.6 mm |
| Width | 73.2 mm | 75.3 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Schott Xensation Up | Schott Xensation Up |
| Colours | Midnight Black, Shimmer Blue | Cosmic Black, Blue, Orange |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | LTPO3 AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,440 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,376 px | 3,200 px |
| Pixel density | 398 ppi | 517 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,500 nits |
| Measured brightness | 818 nits | 1,014 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.1% | 89.9% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 7 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.2 GHz | 3.05 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 730 Mali-G710 MC10 |
| AnTuTu score | 639,612 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,490 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.5 | f/1.6 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | 1/1.3" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 4 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 2× | 5× |
| Max video | 4K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,200 mAh | 4,700 mAh |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 80 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 79% |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | — | 50 W |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.1 (Global)/ 3.2 (China) |
| USB version | 2 | 3.1 |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -25.5 LUFS | -25.1 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display, ultrasonic |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.53 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Funtouch 11.1 | Funtouch 14 (Global) |
