How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. X200 Pro vs X80 Pro

Vivo X200 Pro vs Vivo X80 Pro

What X200 Pro does better (15) and where X80 Pro wins (7) — every spec side by side.

Vivo X200 Pro
Vivo · 2024X200 Pro
9.6Score
15 advantages≈ $670
Higher score
vs
Vivo X80 Pro
Vivo · 2022X80 Pro
9.2Score
7 advantages≈ $920
9.1Display8.7
9.7Camera9.7
8.9Battery7.6
9.5Features8.9
Dimensions

Size comparison

X200 ProX80 Pro
76 × 162.48.275.3 × 164.69.1
X200 ProX80 ProDifference
Height162.4 mm164.6 mm−2.2 mm
Width76 mm75.3 mm+0.7 mm
Thickness8.2 mm9.1 mm−0.9 mm
Weight223 g215 g+8 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is X200 Pro better than X80 Pro?

  1. Peak brightness4,500 nits vs 1,500 nits3×
  2. Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 4,700 mAh+28%
  3. Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 512 GB2×
  4. Measured brightness1,881 nits vs 1,014 nits+86%
  5. RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
  6. Wired charging90 W vs 80 W+12%
  7. 4K video frame rate120 fps vs 60 fps2×
  8. 4K selfie videoYes · X80 Pro: No
  9. eSIMYes · X80 Pro: No
  10. CPU frequency3.63 GHz vs 3.05 GHz+19%
  11. Process3 nm vs 4 nm+33%
  12. Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 6+17%

Why is X80 Pro better than X200 Pro?

  1. Optical zoom3.7× vs 5×+35%
  2. Rear cameras2 vs 42×
  3. Pixel density452 ppi vs 517 ppi+14%
  4. Weight223 g vs 215 g+4%
  5. Wireless charging power30 W vs 50 W+67%
  6. Resolution (width)1,260 px vs 1,440 px+14%
  7. Charged in 30 min73% vs 79%+8%
Specifications

Side by side

Vivo X200 ProVivo X200 Pro≈ $6709.6
Vivo X80 ProVivo X80 Pro≈ $9209.2
Design
Weight223 g215 g
Thickness8.2 mm9.1 mm
Height162.4 mm164.6 mm
Width76 mm75.3 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
BackGlassGlass
Ingress protectionIP68IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protectionScratch/drop-resistant glass (Armor Glass)Schott Xensation Up
ColoursCosmos Black, Titanium Grey, Blue, WhiteCosmic Black, Blue, Orange
Display
Screen size6.8″6.8″
PanelLTPO AMOLEDLTPO3 AMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)YesYes
Resolution (width)1,260 px1,440 px
Resolution (height)2,800 px3,200 px
Pixel density452 ppi517 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness4,500 nits1,500 nits
Measured brightness1,881 nits1,014 nits
Screen-to-body ratio90.3%89.9%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 9400Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
Chip makerMediaTekQualcomm
Process3 nm4 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.63 GHz3.05 GHz
GPUImmortalis-G925Adreno 730 Mali-G710 MC10
AnTuTu score2,609,095—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)8,152—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme6,173—
Memory
RAM16 GB12 GB
Storage (max)1,024 GB512 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.0UFS 3.1
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.6f/1.6
Main sensor size1/1.28"1/1.3"
Rear cameras24
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesYes
Optical zoom3.7×5×
Max video8K8K
4K video frame rate120 fps60 fps
Selfie camera32 MP32 MP
4K selfie videoYesNo
Battery
Battery capacity6,000 mAh4,700 mAh
Battery typeSi/C—
Active use (test)15.2 h—
Wired charging90 W80 W
Charged in 30 min73%79%
Wireless chargingYesYes
Wireless charging power30 W50 W
Reverse wireless chargingYes—
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth5.45.2
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 3.2USB Type-C 3.1 (Global)/ 3.2 (China)
USB version3.23.1
Video outputYes—
Satellite messagingYes—
Infrared portYes—
Dual-band GPSYesYes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavICGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness-25 LUFS-25.1 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorUnder display, ultrasonicUnder display, ultrasonic
SensorsFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
SAR (head)0.99 W/kg—
Software
OS at launchAndroid 15Android 12
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceFuntouch 15 (International)Funtouch 14 (Global)
Major OS updates promised4—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare