How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. X200 vs Poco F5 Pro 5G

Vivo X200 vs Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro 5G

What X200 does better (13) and where Poco F5 Pro 5G wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Vivo X200
Vivo · 2024X200
9.5Score
13 advantages≈ $530
Higher score
vs
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro 5G
Xiaomi · 2023Poco F5 Pro 5G
8.9Score
5 advantages≈ $520
9.2Display8.6
9.3Camera9.1
8.3Battery8.6
9.5Features6.9
Dimensions

Size comparison

X200Poco F5 Pro 5G
74.8 × 160.3875.4 × 162.88.6
X200Poco F5 Pro 5GDifference
Height160.3 mm162.8 mm−2.5 mm
Width74.8 mm75.4 mm−0.6 mm
Thickness8 mm8.6 mm−0.6 mm
Weight197 g204 g−7 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is X200 better than Poco F5 Pro 5G?

  1. Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx32.7×
  2. Peak brightness4,500 nits vs 1,400 nits3.2×
  3. Telephoto cameraYes · Poco F5 Pro 5G: No
  4. Battery capacity5,800 mAh vs 5,160 mAh+12%
  5. Wired charging90 W vs 67 W+34%
  6. Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
  7. 4K selfie videoYes · Poco F5 Pro 5G: No
  8. eSIMYes · Poco F5 Pro 5G: No
  9. CPU frequency3.63 GHz vs 3.19 GHz+14%
  10. Weight197 g vs 204 g+4%
  11. Main camera aperturef/1.6 vs f/1.9+19%
  12. Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7 vs Wi-Fi 6+17%

Why is Poco F5 Pro 5G better than X200?

  1. Wireless chargingNo · X200: Yes
  2. Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
  3. Max video4K vs 8K
  4. Pixel density460 ppi vs 526 ppi+14%
  5. Resolution (width)1,260 px vs 1,440 px+14%
Specifications

Side by side

Vivo X200Vivo X200≈ $5309.5
Design
Weight197 g204 g
Thickness8 mm8.6 mm
Height160.3 mm162.8 mm
Width74.8 mm75.4 mm
FrameAluminium—
BackGlassGlass
Ingress protectionIP68IP53
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx3
Glass protectionSchott Xensation AlphaGorilla Glass 5
ColoursNatural Green (Aurora Green), Cosmos Black, Blue, White, Titanium—
Display
Screen size6.7″6.7″
PanelAMOLEDAMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
Resolution (width)1,260 px1,440 px
Resolution (height)2,800 px3,200 px
Pixel density460 ppi526 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness4,500 nits1,400 nits
Measured brightness1,563 nits—
Screen-to-body ratio89.6%—
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 9400Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
Chip makerMediaTekQualcomm
Process3 nm—
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.63 GHz3.19 GHz
GPUImmortalis-G925Adreno 730
AnTuTu score2,632,874—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)8,014—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme6,334—
Memory
RAM16 GB—
Storage (max)1,024 GB—
Storage (base)256 GB—
Storage typeUFS 4.0—
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP64 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.6f/1.9
Main sensor size1/1.56"—
Rear cameras33
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesNo
Optical zoom3×—
Max video4K8K
4K video frame rate60 fps—
Selfie camera32 MP16 MP
4K selfie videoYesNo
Battery
Battery capacity5,800 mAh5,160 mAh
Battery typeSi/CLi-Po
Active use (test)14.8 h—
Wired charging90 W67 W
Charged in 30 min78%—
Wireless chargingNoYes
Wireless charging power—30 W
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMYesNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth5.45.3
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C
USB version2—
Video outputYes—
Infrared portYes—
Dual-band GPSYes—
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavICGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness-26.7 LUFS—
Fingerprint sensorUnder displayUnder display
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassproximity, accelerometer, gyro, light, fingerprint
SAR (head)1 W/kg—
Software
OS at launchAndroid 15Android 13
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceFuntouch 15 (International)MIUI 14
Major OS updates promised4—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare