- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy S24 Ultra vs X200
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra vs Vivo X200
What Galaxy S24 Ultra does better (11) and where X200 wins (16) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.0Display9.2
8.3Performance9.2
9.8Camera9.3
6.8Battery8.3
9.8Features9.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy S24 UltraX200
| Galaxy S24 Ultra | X200 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.3 mm | 160.3 mm | +2 mm |
| Width | 79 mm | 74.8 mm | +4.2 mm |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 8 mm | +0.6 mm |
| Weight | 232 g | 197 g | +35 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy S24 Ultra better than X200?
- Main camera200 MP vs 50 MP4×
- Wireless chargingYes · X200: No
- Major OS updates promised7 vs 4+75%
- Optical zoom5× vs 3×+67%
- Max video8K vs 4K
- 4K video frame rate120 fps vs 60 fps2×
- Pixel density505 ppi vs 460 ppi+10%
- USB version3.2 vs 2+60%
- Rear cameras4 vs 3+33%
- Resolution (width)1,440 px vs 1,260 px+14%
- Loudspeaker loudness-24.6 LUFS vs -26.7 LUFS+-8%
Why is X200 better than Galaxy S24 Ultra?
- AnTuTu score1,453,497 vs 2,632,874+81%
- Wired charging45 W vs 90 W2×
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 5,800 mAh+16%
- RAM12 GB vs 16 GB+33%
- Peak brightness2,600 nits vs 4,500 nits+73%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)7,076 vs 8,014+13%
- Selfie camera12 MP vs 32 MP2.7×
- Active use (test)13.8 h vs 14.8 h+7%
- 3DMark Wild Life Extreme4,983 vs 6,334+27%
- Weight232 g vs 197 g+18%
- Measured brightness1,447 nits vs 1,563 nits+8%
- CPU frequency3.39 GHz vs 3.63 GHz+7%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 232 g | 197 g |
| Thickness | 8.6 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 162.3 mm | 160.3 mm |
| Width | 79 mm | 74.8 mm |
| Frame | Titanium | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Armor | Schott Xensation Alpha |
| Colours | Titanium Black, Titanium Gray, Titanium Violet, Titanium Yellow, Titanium Blue, Titanium Green, Titanium Orange | Natural Green (Aurora Green), Cosmos Black, Blue, White, Titanium |
| Stylus | Yes | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 1,440 px | 1,260 px |
| Resolution (height) | 3,120 px | 2,800 px |
| Pixel density | 505 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2,600 nits | 4,500 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,447 nits | 1,563 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.5% | 89.6% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8650-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | Mediatek Dimensity 9400 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 3 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.39 GHz | 3.63 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 750 | Immortalis-G925 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,453,497 | 2,632,874 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 7,076 | 8,014 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 4,983 | 6,334 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.6 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.3" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 4 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 5× | 3× |
| Max video | 8K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 120 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 12 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,800 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Si/C |
| Active use (test) | 13.8 h | 14.8 h |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 90 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 65% | 78% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 15 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| Video output | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra Wideband | Yes | — |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -24.6 LUFS | -26.7 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display, ultrasonic | Under display |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 1.06 W/kg | 1 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 9 | Funtouch 15 (International) |
| Major OS updates promised | 7 | 4 |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 UltravsSamsung Galaxy S24 Ultra9.59.3
vsSamsung Galaxy S26 UltravsSamsung Galaxy S24 Ultra9.69.3
vsSamsung Galaxy A55vsSamsung Galaxy S24 Ultra8.19.3
vsSamsung Galaxy S23 UltravsSamsung Galaxy S24 Ultra9.29.3
vsGoogle Pixel 9 Pro XLvsSamsung Galaxy S24 Ultra9.39.3
vsXiaomi 14T ProvsSamsung Galaxy S24 Ultra9.49.3