- android.gs
- Compare
- Pixel 9 Pro XL vs X200
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL vs Vivo X200
What Pixel 9 Pro XL does better (10) and where X200 wins (14) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.1Display9.2
8.1Performance9.2
9.7Camera9.3
6.7Battery8.3
9.8Features9.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Pixel 9 Pro XLX200
| Pixel 9 Pro XL | X200 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.8 mm | 160.3 mm | +2.5 mm |
| Width | 76.6 mm | 74.8 mm | +1.8 mm |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 8 mm | +0.5 mm |
| Weight | 221 g | 197 g | +24 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Pixel 9 Pro XL better than X200?
- Wireless chargingYes · X200: No
- Major OS updates promised7 vs 4+75%
- Optical zoom5× vs 3×+67%
- Measured brightness2,365 nits vs 1,563 nits+51%
- Max video8K vs 4K
- Pixel density486 ppi vs 460 ppi+6%
- USB version3.2 vs 2+60%
- Selfie camera42 MP vs 32 MP+31%
- Resolution (width)1,344 px vs 1,260 px+7%
- Loudspeaker loudness-25.5 LUFS vs -26.7 LUFS+-4%
Why is X200 better than Pixel 9 Pro XL?
- Wired charging37 W vs 90 W2.4×
- AnTuTu score1,380,138 vs 2,632,874+91%
- 3DMark Wild Life Extreme2,540 vs 6,3342.5×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)4,854 vs 8,014+65%
- Battery capacity5,060 mAh vs 5,800 mAh+15%
- Active use (test)12.5 h vs 14.8 h+18%
- Peak brightness3,000 nits vs 4,500 nits+50%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- CPU frequency3.1 GHz vs 3.63 GHz+17%
- Weight221 g vs 197 g+12%
- Process4 nm vs 3 nm+33%
- Charged in 30 min70% vs 78%+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 221 g | 197 g |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 162.8 mm | 160.3 mm |
| Width | 76.6 mm | 74.8 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 | Schott Xensation Alpha |
| Colours | Porcelain, Rose Quartz, Hazel, Obsidian | Natural Green (Aurora Green), Cosmos Black, Blue, White, Titanium |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | LTPO OLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 1,344 px | 1,260 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,992 px | 2,800 px |
| Pixel density | 486 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits | 4,500 nits |
| Measured brightness | 2,365 nits | 1,563 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88% | 89.6% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Google Tensor G4 | Mediatek Dimensity 9400 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | |
| Process | 4 nm | 3 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.1 GHz | 3.63 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G715 MC7 | Immortalis-G925 |
| AnTuTu score | 1,380,138 | 2,632,874 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 4,854 | 8,014 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 2,540 | 6,334 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.6 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.31" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 5× | 3× |
| Max video | 8K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 42 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,060 mAh | 5,800 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Si/C |
| Active use (test) | 12.5 h | 14.8 h |
| Wired charging | 37 W | 90 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 70% | 78% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 23 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| Video output | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra Wideband | Yes | — |
| Satellite messaging | Yes | — |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -25.5 LUFS | -26.7 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display, ultrasonic | Under display |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, thermometer (skin temperature) | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.99 W/kg | 1 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | Funtouch 15 (International) |
| Major OS updates promised | 7 | 4 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | B | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,000 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 50 h | — |
| Repairability class | C | — |
| Drop resistance class | A | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Google Pixel 9 Pro XLvsSamsung Galaxy S24 Ultra9.39.3
vsGoogle Pixel 10 Pro XLvsGoogle Pixel 9 Pro XL9.49.3vs
Google Pixel 9 Pro XLvsVivo V40 Pro9.39.2vs
Google Pixel 9 Pro XLvsVivo iQOO Neo9 Pro9.39.2vs
Google Pixel 9 Pro XLvsHonor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design9.39.3vs
Samsung Galaxy S24 UltravsVivo X2009.39.5