- android.gs
- Compare
- X200 vs X80
Vivo X200 vs Vivo X80
What X200 does better (17) and where X80 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
X200X80
| X200 | X80 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 160.3 mm | 165 mm | −4.7 mm |
| Width | 74.8 mm | 75.2 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8.3 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Weight | 197 g | 203 g | −6 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X200 better than X80?
- Peak brightness4,500 nits vs 1,500 nits3×
- Battery capacity5,800 mAh vs 4,500 mAh+29%
- Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 512 GB2×
- RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
- Optical zoom3× vs 2×+50%
- Wired charging90 W vs 80 W+12%
- Storage (base)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- 4K selfie videoYes · X80: No
- eSIMYes · X80: No
- CPU frequency3.63 GHz vs 3.05 GHz+19%
- Pixel density460 ppi vs 388 ppi+19%
- Weight197 g vs 203 g+3%
Why is X80 better than X200?
- Charged in 30 min78% vs 136%+74%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 197 g | 203 g |
| Thickness | 8 mm | 8.3 mm |
| Height | 160.3 mm | 165 mm |
| Width | 74.8 mm | 75.2 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | — |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Schott Xensation Alpha | — |
| Colours | Natural Green (Aurora Green), Cosmos Black, Blue, White, Titanium | Cosmic Black, Urban Blue, Orange |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,260 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,800 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 460 ppi | 388 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,500 nits | 1,500 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,563 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.6% | 89.4% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9400 | Mediatek Dimensity 9000 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.63 GHz | 3.05 GHz |
| GPU | Immortalis-G925 | Mali-G710 MC10 |
| AnTuTu score | 2,632,874 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 8,014 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 6,334 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.49" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 3× | 2× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,800 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Si/C | — |
| Active use (test) | 14.8 h | — |
| Wired charging | 90 W | 80 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 78% | 136% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Video output | Yes | — |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -26.7 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 1 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | Funtouch 15 (International) | Funtouch 14 (Global) |
| Major OS updates promised | 4 | — |
