How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. X200 Pro mini vs Poco M6 Pro 4G

Vivo X200 Pro mini vs Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro 4G

What X200 Pro mini does better (22) and where Poco M6 Pro 4G wins (7) — every spec side by side.

Vivo X200 Pro mini
Vivo · 2024X200 Pro mini
9.5Score
22 advantages≈ $660
Higher score
vs
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro 4G
Xiaomi · 2024Poco M6 Pro 4G
7.2Score
7 advantages≈ $670
8.2Display8.2
9.2Performance3.8
9.3Camera8.3
9.1Battery5.3
9.3Features5.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

X200 Pro miniPoco M6 Pro 4G
71.8 × 150.88.275 × 161.18
X200 Pro miniPoco M6 Pro 4GDifference
Height150.8 mm161.1 mm−10.3 mm
Width71.8 mm75 mm−3.2 mm
Thickness8.2 mm8 mm+0.2 mm
Weight187 g179 g+8 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is X200 Pro mini better than Poco M6 Pro 4G?

  1. AnTuTu score2,779,129 vs 386,3017.2×
  2. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)8,705 vs 1,8924.6×
  3. Peak brightness4,500 nits vs 1,300 nits3.5×
  4. Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
  5. Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 512 GB2×
  6. Telephoto cameraYes · Poco M6 Pro 4G: No
  7. Wireless chargingYes · Poco M6 Pro 4G: No
  8. Stereo speakersYes · Poco M6 Pro 4G: No
  9. Battery capacity5,700 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+14%
  10. Wired charging90 W vs 67 W+34%
  11. RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
  12. Measured brightness1,805 nits vs 1,053 nits+71%

Why is Poco M6 Pro 4G better than X200 Pro mini?

  1. Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
  2. Memory card slotNo · X200 Pro mini: Yes
  3. 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · X200 Pro mini: Yes
  4. Screen size6.3″ vs 6.7″+6%
  5. Weight187 g vs 179 g+4%
  6. Charged in 30 min62% vs 68%+10%
  7. Thickness8.2 mm vs 8 mm+2%
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight187 g179 g
Thickness8.2 mm8 mm
Height150.8 mm161.1 mm
Width71.8 mm75 mm
FrameAluminiumPlastic
Ingress protectionIP68IP54
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx4
Glass protection—Corning Gorilla Glass 5
ColoursBlack, White, Green, PinkBlack, Blue, Purple
Display
Screen size6.3″6.7″
PanelLTPO AMOLEDAMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)Yes—
Resolution (width)1,216 px1,080 px
Resolution (height)2,640 px2,400 px
Pixel density460 ppi395 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness4,500 nits1,300 nits
Measured brightness1,805 nits1,053 nits
Screen-to-body ratio90.5%88.9%
HDRYes—
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 9400Mediatek Helio G99 Ultra
Chip makerMediaTekMediaTek
Process3 nm—
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.63 GHz2.2 GHz
GPUImmortalis-G925Mali-G57 MC2
AnTuTu score2,779,129386,301
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)8,7051,892
3DMark Wild Life Extreme5,665—
Memory
RAM16 GB12 GB
Storage (max)1,024 GB512 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.0UFS 2.2
Memory card slotNoYes
Camera
Main camera50 MP64 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.6f/1.8
Main sensor size1/1.28"1/2.0"
Rear cameras32
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesNo
Optical zoom3×—
Max video4K1080p
4K video frame rate60 fps—
Selfie camera32 MP16 MP
4K selfie videoYesNo
Battery
Battery capacity5,700 mAh5,000 mAh
Battery typeSi/C—
Active use (test)—11.8 h
Wired charging90 W67 W
Charged in 30 min62%68%
Wireless chargingYesNo
Wireless charging power30 W—
Connectivity
5GYes—
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth5.45.2
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
USB version22
Infrared portYes—
Dual-band GPSYes—
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavICGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakersYesNo
3.5 mm headphone jackNoYes
Loudspeaker loudness—-25 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorUnder displayUnder display
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass
SAR (head)—0.99 W/kg
Software
OS at launchAndroid 15Android 13
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceOriginOS 5 (China)MIUI 14
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare