How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. X200 Pro mini vs nubia Z70 Ultra

Vivo X200 Pro mini vs ZTE nubia Z70 Ultra

What X200 Pro mini does better (11) and where nubia Z70 Ultra wins (11) — every spec side by side.

Vivo X200 Pro mini
Vivo · 2024X200 Pro mini
9.5Score
11 advantages≈ $660
Higher score
vs
ZTE nubia Z70 Ultra
ZTE · 2024nubia Z70 Ultra
9.4Score
11 advantages≈ $650
8.2Display9.6
9.2Performance9.4
9.3Camera9.2
9.1Battery7.7
9.3Features9.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

X200 Pro mininubia Z70 Ultra
71.8 × 150.88.277.1 × 164.38.6
X200 Pro mininubia Z70 UltraDifference
Height150.8 mm164.3 mm−13.5 mm
Width71.8 mm77.1 mm−5.3 mm
Thickness8.2 mm8.6 mm−0.4 mm
Weight187 g228 g−41 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is X200 Pro mini better than nubia Z70 Ultra?

  1. Peak brightness4,500 nits vs 2,000 nits2.2×
  2. Wireless chargingYes · nubia Z70 Ultra: No
  3. AnTuTu score2,779,129 vs 2,701,464+3%
  4. Wired charging90 W vs 80 W+12%
  5. Measured brightness1,805 nits vs 1,382 nits+31%
  6. Weight187 g vs 228 g+22%
  7. Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
  8. 4K selfie videoYes · nubia Z70 Ultra: No
  9. Optical zoom3× vs 2.7×+11%
  10. Pixel density460 ppi vs 431 ppi+7%
  11. Thickness8.2 mm vs 8.6 mm+5%

Why is nubia Z70 Ultra better than X200 Pro mini?

  1. RAM16 GB vs 24 GB+50%
  2. Battery capacity5,700 mAh vs 6,150 mAh+8%
  3. Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
  4. Geekbench 6 (multi-core)8,705 vs 9,509+9%
  5. Max video4K vs 8K
  6. 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 120 fps2×
  7. CPU frequency3.63 GHz vs 4.32 GHz+19%
  8. Screen size6.3″ vs 6.8″+9%
  9. 3DMark Wild Life Extreme5,665 vs 5,918+4%
  10. USB version2 vs 3.2+60%
  11. Charged in 30 min62% vs 84%+35%
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight187 g228 g
Thickness8.2 mm8.6 mm
Height150.8 mm164.3 mm
Width71.8 mm77.1 mm
FrameAluminiumAluminium
Back—Glass
Ingress protectionIP68IP68
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8IPx8
Glass protection—Longxi glass (gen 2)
ColoursBlack, White, Green, PinkBlack, Gold, Starry Night, Orange
Display
Screen size6.3″6.8″
PanelLTPO AMOLEDAMOLED
OLED panelYesYes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)Yes—
Resolution (width)1,216 px1,216 px
Resolution (height)2,640 px2,688 px
Pixel density460 ppi431 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz144 Hz
Peak brightness4,500 nits2,000 nits
Measured brightness1,805 nits1,382 nits
Screen-to-body ratio90.5%89.7%
HDRYesYes
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 9400Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite
Chip makerMediaTekQualcomm
Process3 nm3 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency3.63 GHz4.32 GHz
GPUImmortalis-G925Adreno 830
AnTuTu score2,779,1292,701,464
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)8,7059,509
3DMark Wild Life Extreme5,6655,918
Memory
RAM16 GB24 GB
Storage (max)1,024 GB1,024 GB
Storage (base)256 GB256 GB
Storage typeUFS 4.0UFS 4.0
Memory card slotNoNo
Camera
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.6f/1.6
Main sensor size1/1.28"1/1.56"
Rear cameras33
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Ultra-wide cameraYesYes
Telephoto cameraYesYes
Optical zoom3×2.7×
Max video4K8K
4K video frame rate60 fps120 fps
Selfie camera32 MP16 MP
4K selfie videoYesNo
Battery
Battery capacity5,700 mAh6,150 mAh
Battery typeSi/CSi/C
Active use (test)—13 h
Wired charging90 W80 W
Charged in 30 min62%84%
Wireless chargingYesNo
Wireless charging power30 W—
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 3.2
USB version23.2
Video output—Yes
Infrared portYesYes
Dual-band GPSYesYes
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavICGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5 mm headphone jackNoNo
Loudspeaker loudness—-25.9 LUFS
Fingerprint sensorUnder displayUnder display
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Software
OS at launchAndroid 15Android 15
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceOriginOS 5 (China)NebulaAI OS
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare