- android.gs
- Compare
- 200 Lite vs Poco M6 Pro 4G
Honor 200 Lite vs Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro 4G
What 200 Lite does better (7) and where Poco M6 Pro 4G wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.9Display8.2
5.0Performance3.8
7.6Camera8.3
4.2Battery5.3
7.1Features5.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
200 LitePoco M6 Pro 4G
| 200 Lite | Poco M6 Pro 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.1 mm | 161.1 mm | = |
| Width | 74.6 mm | 75 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Thickness | 6.8 mm | 8 mm | −1.2 mm |
| Weight | 166 g | 179 g | −13 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is 200 Lite better than Poco M6 Pro 4G?
- AnTuTu score552,130 vs 386,301+43%
- Main camera108 MP vs 64 MP+69%
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 16 MP3.1×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,076 vs 1,892+10%
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+9%
- Weight166 g vs 179 g+8%
- Thickness6.8 mm vs 8 mm+18%
Why is Poco M6 Pro 4G better than 200 Lite?
- Wired charging35 W vs 67 W+91%
- Peak brightness600 nits vs 1,300 nits2.2×
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationNo · 200 Lite: Yes
- Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+11%
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Memory card slotNo · 200 Lite: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · 200 Lite: Yes
- Charged in 30 min47% vs 68%+45%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 166 g | 179 g |
| Thickness | 6.8 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 161.1 mm | 161.1 mm |
| Width | 74.6 mm | 75 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | — | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Starry Blue, Cyan Lake, Black | Black, Blue, Purple |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,412 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 600 nits | 1,300 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,053 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.9% | 88.9% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6080 | Mediatek Helio G99 Ultra |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 552,130 | 386,301 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,076 | 1,892 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Active use (test) | — | 11.8 h |
| Wired charging | 35 W | 67 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 47% | 68% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | — |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -25 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.84 W/kg | 0.99 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | MagicOS 8 | MIUI 14 |
