- android.gs
- Compare
- X100s vs X200
Vivo X100s vs Vivo X200
What X100s does better (3) and where X200 wins (9) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
X100sX200
| X100s | X200 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.1 mm | 160.3 mm | +2.8 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 74.8 mm | +1 mm |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 8 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Weight | 203 g | 197 g | +6 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X100s better than X200?
- Wired charging100 W vs 90 W+11%
- Charged in 30 min136% vs 78%+74%
- Thickness7.8 mm vs 8 mm+3%
Why is X200 better than X100s?
- AnTuTu score2,233,931 vs 2,632,874+18%
- Battery capacity5,100 mAh vs 5,800 mAh+14%
- Peak brightness3,000 nits vs 4,500 nits+50%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)7,661 vs 8,014+5%
- 4K selfie videoNo · X100s: Yes
- eSIMNo · X100s: Yes
- CPU frequency3.4 GHz vs 3.63 GHz+7%
- Weight203 g vs 197 g+3%
- Process4 nm vs 3 nm+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 203 g | 197 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 163.1 mm | 160.3 mm |
| Width | 75.8 mm | 74.8 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | Schott Xensation Alpha |
| Colours | Titanium, White, Grey, Green | Natural Green (Aurora Green), Cosmos Black, Blue, White, Titanium |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | LTPO AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 1,260 px | 1,260 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,800 px | 2,800 px |
| Pixel density | 453 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 3,000 nits | 4,500 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,563 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.8% | 89.6% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ | Mediatek Dimensity 9400 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 3 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 3.4 GHz | 3.63 GHz |
| GPU | Immortalis-G720 MC12 | Immortalis-G925 |
| AnTuTu score | 2,233,931 | 2,632,874 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 7,661 | 8,014 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 6,334 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.6 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.49" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 3× | 3× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,100 mAh | 5,800 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Si/C |
| Active use (test) | — | 14.8 h |
| Wired charging | 100 W | 90 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 136% | 78% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Video output | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -26.7 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 1 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | OriginOS 4 | Funtouch 15 (International) |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 4 |
