- android.gs
- Compare
- Pova 2 vs Pova 4
Tecno Pova 2 vs Tecno Pova 4
What Pova 2 does better (6) and where Pova 4 wins (13) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Pova 2Pova 4
| Pova 2 | Pova 4 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 173.3 mm | 170.6 mm | +2.7 mm |
| Width | 78.8 mm | 77.5 mm | +1.3 mm |
| Thickness | 9.6 mm | 8.7 mm | +0.9 mm |
| Weight | 207 g | 214 g | −7 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Pova 2 better than Pova 4?
- Battery capacity7,000 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+17%
- Pixel density389 ppi vs 257 ppi+51%
- Peak brightness480 nits vs 450 nits+7%
- Weight207 g vs 214 g+3%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 720 px+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 4+25%
Why is Pova 4 better than Pova 2?
- AnTuTu score362,076 vs 540,584+49%
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 90 Hz+50%
- Stereo speakersNo · Pova 2: Yes
- 3DMark Wild Life Extreme181 vs 343+90%
- RAM6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,565 vs 1,640+5%
- Main camera48 MP vs 50 MP+4%
- Process12 nm vs 6 nm2×
- Storage (base)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
- CPU frequency2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+10%
- Thickness9.6 mm vs 8.7 mm+10%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 207 g | 214 g |
| Thickness | 9.6 mm | 8.7 mm |
| Height | 173.3 mm | 170.6 mm |
| Width | 78.8 mm | 77.5 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colours | Polar Silver, Power Blue, Dazzle Black | Cryolite Blue, Uranolith Grey |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.9″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,460 px | 1,600 px |
| Pixel density | 389 ppi | 257 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 480 nits | 450 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.8% | 84.9% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 | Mediatek Helio G99 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 362,076 | 540,584 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,565 | 1,640 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 181 | 343 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 18 W | 18 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 25% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | HIOS 7.6 | HiOS 12 |
