android.gs
Compare
Phantom V Flip2 vs Mix Fold 4

Tecno Phantom V Flip2 vs Xiaomi Mix Fold 4

What Phantom V Flip2 does better (4) and where Mix Fold 4 wins (19) — every spec side by side.

Tecno · 2024Phantom V Flip2

5.7Score

4 advantages

Xiaomi · 2024Mix Fold 4

9.2Score

19 advantages≈ $1,250

Higher score

6.0Display8.6

2.5Performance8.1

5.2Camera9.6

6.2Battery9.1

4.7Features7.4

Dimensions

Size comparison

Phantom V Flip2Mix Fold 4

	Phantom V Flip2	Mix Fold 4	Difference
Height	170.8 mm	159.4 mm	+11.4 mm
Width	73.4 mm	143.3 mm	−69.9 mm
Thickness	7.6 mm	4.6 mm	+3 mm
Weight	196 g	226 g	−30 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Phantom V Flip2 better than Mix Fold 4?

Wired charging70 W vs 67 W+4%
Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
Weight196 g vs 226 g+15%
Charged in 30 min100% vs 93%+8%

Why is Mix Fold 4 better than Phantom V Flip2?

AnTuTu score775,306 vs 1,991,6722.6×
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,544 vs 6,6302.6×
RAM8 GB vs 16 GB2×
Storage (max)256 GB vs 1,024 GB4×
Telephoto cameraNo · Phantom V Flip2: Yes
Wireless chargingNo · Phantom V Flip2: Yes
Battery capacity4,720 mAh vs 5,100 mAh+8%
CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 3.3 GHz+27%
Measured brightness893 nits vs 1,110 nits+24%
Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 2,224 px2.1×
Rear cameras2 vs 42×
Max video4K vs 8K

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Tecno Phantom V Flip25.7	Xiaomi Mix Fold 4≈ $1,2509.2
Design
Weight	196 g	226 g
Thickness	7.6 mm	4.6 mm
Height	170.8 mm	159.4 mm
Width	73.4 mm	143.3 mm
Frame	Aluminium	Aluminium
Back	Eco leather	Glass
Ingress protection	—	IPX8
Water resistance (IPx)	—	IPx8
Colours	Travertine Green, Moondust Grey	Black, White, Blue
Display
Screen size	6.9″	8″
Panel	Foldable LTPO AMOLED	Foldable LTPO AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)	Yes	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	2,224 px
Resolution (height)	2,640 px	2,488 px
Pixel density	413 ppi	418 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	—	3,000 nits
Measured brightness	893 nits	1,110 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	85.9%	89.4%
HDR	—	Yes
Foldable	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Mediatek Dimensity 8020	Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
Chip maker	MediaTek	Qualcomm
Process	6 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.6 GHz	3.3 GHz
GPU	Mali-G77 MC9	Adreno 750
AnTuTu score	775,306	1,991,672
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	2,544	6,630
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	1,247	—
Memory
RAM	8 GB	16 GB
Storage (max)	256 GB	1,024 GB
Storage (base)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage type	—	UFS 4.0
Memory card slot	No	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	—	f/1.7
Main sensor size	1/1.57"	1/1.49"
Rear cameras	2	4
Optical stabilisation	Yes	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	No	Yes
Optical zoom	—	5×
Max video	4K	8K
4K video frame rate	30 fps	60 fps
Selfie camera	32 MP	16 MP
4K selfie video	No	No
Battery
Battery capacity	4,720 mAh	5,100 mAh
Battery type	—	Li-Po
Active use (test)	11.6 h	—
Wired charging	70 W	67 W
Charged in 30 min	100%	93%
Wireless charging	No	Yes
Wireless charging power	—	50 W
Reverse wireless charging	—	Yes
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	No	No
Dual SIM	No	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6	Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth	5.3	5.4
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C	USB Type-C 3.2
USB version	—	3.2
Video output	—	Yes
Satellite messaging	—	Yes
Infrared port	—	Yes
Dual-band GPS	—	Yes
Satellite navigation	—	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	-26.6 LUFS	—
Fingerprint sensor	Side	Side
Barometer	—	Yes
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity (incl. for accessories), compass	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
Software
OS at launch	Android 14	Android 14
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	—	HyperOS