android.gs
Compare
Razr 40 vs Phantom V Flip2

Motorola Razr 40 vs Tecno Phantom V Flip2

What Razr 40 does better (14) and where Phantom V Flip2 wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Motorola · 2023Razr 40

4.7Score

14 advantages≈ $215

Tecno · 2024Phantom V Flip2

5.7Score

5 advantages

Higher score

6.3Display6.0

2.2Performance2.5

5.9Camera5.2

3.4Battery6.2

3.5Features4.7

Dimensions

Size comparison

Razr 40Phantom V Flip2

	Razr 40	Phantom V Flip2	Difference
Height	170.8 mm	170.8 mm	=
Width	74 mm	73.4 mm	+0.6 mm
Thickness	7.4 mm	7.6 mm	−0.2 mm
Weight	189 g	196 g	−7 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Razr 40 better than Phantom V Flip2?

RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
Wireless chargingYes · Phantom V Flip2: No
Main camera64 MP vs 50 MP+28%
Refresh rate144 Hz vs 120 Hz+20%
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,873 vs 2,544+13%
4K selfie videoYes · Phantom V Flip2: No
eSIMYes · Phantom V Flip2: No
Dual SIMYes · Phantom V Flip2: No
Measured brightness1,064 nits vs 893 nits+19%
Weight189 g vs 196 g+4%
Process4 nm vs 6 nm+50%
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6E vs Wi-Fi 6+8%

Why is Phantom V Flip2 better than Razr 40?

Wired charging30 W vs 70 W2.3×
AnTuTu score492,343 vs 775,306+57%
Battery capacity4,200 mAh vs 4,720 mAh+12%
Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.6 GHz+8%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Motorola Razr 40≈ $2154.7	Tecno Phantom V Flip25.7
Design
Weight	189 g	196 g
Thickness	7.4 mm	7.6 mm
Height	170.8 mm	170.8 mm
Width	74 mm	73.4 mm
Frame	Aluminium	Aluminium
Back	Plastic	Eco leather
Ingress protection	IP52	—
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx2	—
Glass protection	Gorilla Glass Victus	—
Colours	Sage Green, Vanilla Cream, Summer Lilac, Grape Compote, Cherry Blossom	Travertine Green, Moondust Grey
Display
Screen size	6.9″	6.9″
Panel	Foldable LTPO AMOLED	Foldable LTPO AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz)	Yes	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	2,640 px	2,640 px
Pixel density	413 ppi	413 ppi
Refresh rate	144 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	1,400 nits	—
Measured brightness	1,064 nits	893 nits
Screen-to-body ratio	85.1%	85.9%
HDR	Yes	—
Foldable	Yes	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1	Mediatek Dimensity 8020
Chip maker	Qualcomm	MediaTek
Process	4 nm	6 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.4 GHz	2.6 GHz
GPU	Adreno 644	Mali-G77 MC9
AnTuTu score	492,343	775,306
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	2,873	2,544
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	—	1,247
Memory
RAM	12 GB	8 GB
Storage (max)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage (base)	128 GB	256 GB
Storage type	UFS 2.2	—
Memory card slot	No	No
Camera
Main camera	64 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.7	—
Main sensor size	1/2.0"	1/1.57"
Rear cameras	2	2
Optical stabilisation	Yes	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	No	No
Max video	4K	4K
4K video frame rate	30 fps	30 fps
Selfie camera	32 MP	32 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	No
Battery
Battery capacity	4,200 mAh	4,720 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	—
Active use (test)	—	11.6 h
Wired charging	30 W	70 W
Charged in 30 min	—	100%
Wireless charging	Yes	No
Wireless charging power	5 W	—
Reverse wireless charging	Yes	—
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	Yes	No
Dual SIM	Yes	No
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6E	Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth	5.3	5.3
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C
USB version	2	—
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	—
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	-25.6 LUFS	-26.6 LUFS
Fingerprint sensor	Side	Side
Barometer	Yes	—
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer (USA only)	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity (incl. for accessories), compass
Software
OS at launch	Android 13	Android 14
Platform	Android	Android
Major OS updates promised	3	—