- android.gs
- Compare
- Phantom V Flip2 vs X Flip
Tecno Phantom V Flip2 vs Vivo X Flip
What Phantom V Flip2 does better (6) and where X Flip wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.0Display5.1
2.5Performance4.8
5.2Camera5.2
6.2Battery4.7
4.7Features3.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Phantom V Flip2X Flip
| Phantom V Flip2 | X Flip | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 170.8 mm | 166.4 mm | +4.4 mm |
| Width | 73.4 mm | 75.3 mm | −1.9 mm |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 7.8 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Weight | 196 g | 198 g | −2 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Phantom V Flip2 better than X Flip?
- Wired charging70 W vs 44 W+59%
- Stereo speakersYes · X Flip: No
- Battery capacity4,720 mAh vs 4,400 mAh+7%
- Screen size6.9″ vs 6.7″+2%
- Loudspeaker loudness-26.6 LUFS vs -29.2 LUFS+-9%
- Thickness7.6 mm vs 7.8 mm+3%
Why is X Flip better than Phantom V Flip2?
- AnTuTu score775,306 vs 1,060,911+37%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,544 vs 3,930+54%
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Dual SIMNo · Phantom V Flip2: Yes
- CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 3 GHz+15%
- Measured brightness893 nits vs 1,027 nits+15%
- Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 196 g | 198 g |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 170.8 mm | 166.4 mm |
| Width | 73.4 mm | 75.3 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Eco leather | Glass |
| Colours | Travertine Green, Moondust Grey | Rhombic Purple, Silk Gold, Diamond Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.9″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | Foldable LTPO AMOLED | Foldable LTPO AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,640 px | 2,520 px |
| Pixel density | 413 ppi | 407 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Measured brightness | 893 nits | 1,027 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.9% | 84.7% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8020 | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.6 GHz | 3 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 730 |
| AnTuTu score | 775,306 | 1,060,911 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,544 | 3,930 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,247 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | — | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.57" | 1/1.49" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,720 mAh | 4,400 mAh |
| Active use (test) | 11.6 h | — |
| Wired charging | 70 W | 44 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 100% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | — | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -26.6 LUFS | -29.2 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity (incl. for accessories), compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | — | OriginOS 3 |
