- android.gs
- Compare
- Camon 40 vs Y400 4G
Tecno Camon 40 vs Vivo Y400 4G
What Camon 40 does better (11) and where Y400 4G wins (6) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Camon 40Y400 4G
| Camon 40 | Y400 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.1 mm | 162.3 mm | +1.8 mm |
| Width | 74.6 mm | 75.3 mm | −0.7 mm |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm | 7.9 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Weight | 177 g | 196 g | −19 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Camon 40 better than Y400 4G?
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- Optical stabilisationYes · Y400 4G: No
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 8 MP4×
- Wired charging45 W vs 44 W+2%
- Memory card slotYes · Y400 4G: No
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Y400 4G: No
- Weight177 g vs 196 g+11%
- Thickness7.3 mm vs 7.9 mm+8%
- Bluetooth5.3 vs 5+6%
- Screen-to-body ratio89.8% vs 87.9%+2%
Why is Y400 4G better than Camon 40?
- Battery capacity5,200 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+15%
- Peak brightness1,300 nits vs 1,800 nits+38%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx6 vs IPx8+33%
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.8 GHz+27%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 4 vs Wi-Fi 5+25%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 177 g | 196 g |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm | 7.9 mm |
| Height | 164.1 mm | 162.3 mm |
| Width | 74.6 mm | 75.3 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP66 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx6 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Panda King Glass | — |
| Colours | Emerald Lake Green, Galaxy Black, Glacier White, Emerald Glow Green | Purple Twilight, Tropical Green (Dynamic Green), Pearl White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,436 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,300 nits | 1,800 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.8% | 87.9% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G100 Ultimate | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 610 |
| AnTuTu score | 575,113 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,986 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/2.96" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,200 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 44 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 65% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | — |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | HIOS 15 | Funtouch 15 |
| Major OS updates promised | 3 | — |
