android.gs
Compare
Galaxy A36 vs Camon 40

Samsung Galaxy A36 vs Tecno Camon 40

What Galaxy A36 does better (13) and where Camon 40 wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Samsung · 2025Galaxy A36

8.1Score

13 advantages≈ $210

Higher score

Tecno · 2025Camon 40

8.0Score

6 advantages

8.1Display8.4

5.8Performance4.9

7.9Camera8.2

4.8Battery7.9

9.4Features5.4

Dimensions

Size comparison

Galaxy A36Camon 40

	Galaxy A36	Camon 40	Difference
Height	162.9 mm	164.1 mm	−1.2 mm
Width	78.2 mm	74.6 mm	+3.6 mm
Thickness	7.4 mm	7.3 mm	+0.1 mm
Weight	195 g	177 g	+18 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Galaxy A36 better than Camon 40?

Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,917 vs 1,986+47%
5GYes · Camon 40: No
Major OS updates promised6 vs 32×
AnTuTu score613,492 vs 575,113+7%
Peak brightness1,900 nits vs 1,300 nits+46%
Max video4K vs 1080p
4K selfie videoYes · Camon 40: No
eSIMYes · Camon 40: No
Water resistance (IPx)IPx7 vs IPx6+17%
CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+9%
Process4 nm vs 6 nm+50%
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 4+50%

Why is Camon 40 better than Galaxy A36?

Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 5,200 mAh+4%
Selfie camera12 MP vs 32 MP2.7×
Memory card slotNo · Galaxy A36: Yes
Weight195 g vs 177 g+10%
Pixel density385 ppi vs 393 ppi+2%
Screen-to-body ratio86.5% vs 89.8%+4%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Samsung Galaxy A36≈ $2108.1	Tecno Camon 408.0
Design
Weight	195 g	177 g
Thickness	7.4 mm	7.3 mm
Height	162.9 mm	164.1 mm
Width	78.2 mm	74.6 mm
Frame	Plastic	Plastic
Back	Glass	Plastic
Ingress protection	IP67	IP66
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx7	IPx6
Glass protection	Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+	Panda King Glass
Colours	Lavender, Black, White, Lime	Emerald Lake Green, Galaxy Black, Glacier White, Emerald Glow Green
Display
Screen size	6.7″	6.8″
Panel	Super AMOLED	AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	2,340 px	2,436 px
Pixel density	385 ppi	393 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	1,900 nits	1,300 nits
Measured brightness	1,233 nits	—
Screen-to-body ratio	86.5%	89.8%
HDR	Yes	—
Performance
Chipset	Qualcomm SM6475-AB Snapdragon 6 Gen 3	Mediatek Helio G100 Ultimate
Chip maker	Qualcomm	MediaTek
Process	4 nm	6 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.4 GHz	2.2 GHz
GPU	Adreno 710	Mali-G57 MC2
AnTuTu score	613,492	575,113
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	2,917	1,986
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	912	—
Memory
RAM	12 GB	12 GB
Storage (max)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage (base)	128 GB	128 GB
Storage type	UFS 2.2	UFS 2.2
Memory card slot	No	Yes
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.9
Main sensor size	1/1.96"	1/1.56"
Rear cameras	2	2
Optical stabilisation	Yes	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	No	No
Max video	4K	1080p
4K video frame rate	30 fps	—
Selfie camera	12 MP	32 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	No
Battery
Battery capacity	5,000 mAh	5,200 mAh
Battery type	Li-Ion	Li-Po
Active use (test)	11.6 h	—
Wired charging	45 W	45 W
Charged in 30 min	66%	65%
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
5G	Yes	No
eSIM	Yes	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6	Wi-Fi 4
Bluetooth	5.4	5.3
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	2	2
Infrared port	—	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	GLONASS, GALILEO
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	-26.2 LUFS	—
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	Under display
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
SAR (head)	0.53 W/kg	—
Software
OS at launch	Android 15	Android 15
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	One UI 9	HIOS 15
Major OS updates promised	6	3
EU label
Energy class	C	—
Battery charge cycles	2,000	—
Endurance per cycle	42 h	—
Repairability class	C	—
Drop resistance class	C	—