- android.gs
- Compare
- Camon 40 vs iQOO Z10R (India)
Tecno Camon 40 vs Vivo iQOO Z10R (India)
What Camon 40 does better (7) and where iQOO Z10R (India) wins (11) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.4Display8.2
4.9Performance7.3
8.2Camera7.8
7.9Battery8.0
5.4Features6.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
Camon 40iQOO Z10R (India)
| Camon 40 | iQOO Z10R (India) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.1 mm | 163.3 mm | +0.8 mm |
| Width | 74.6 mm | 76.7 mm | −2.1 mm |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm | 7.4 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Weight | 177 g | 184 g | −7 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Camon 40 better than iQOO Z10R (India)?
- NFCYes · iQOO Z10R (India): No
- Major OS updates promised3 vs 2+50%
- Wired charging45 W vs 44 W+2%
- Memory card slotYes · iQOO Z10R (India): No
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · iQOO Z10R (India): No
- Weight177 g vs 184 g+4%
Why is iQOO Z10R (India) better than Camon 40?
- AnTuTu score575,113 vs 911,502+58%
- 5GNo · Camon 40: Yes
- Battery capacity5,200 mAh vs 5,700 mAh+10%
- Peak brightness1,300 nits vs 1,800 nits+38%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx6 vs IPx8+33%
- Max video1080p vs 4K
- 4K selfie videoNo · Camon 40: Yes
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2.6 GHz+18%
- Process6 nm vs 4 nm+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 4 vs Wi-Fi 6+50%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 177 g | 184 g |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm | 7.4 mm |
| Height | 164.1 mm | 163.3 mm |
| Width | 74.6 mm | 76.7 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP66 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx6 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Panda King Glass | Schott Xensation Alpha |
| Colours | Emerald Lake Green, Galaxy Black, Glacier White, Emerald Glow Green | Aquamarine, Moonstone |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,436 px | 2,392 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 387 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,300 nits | 1,800 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.8% | 89% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G100 Ultimate | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G615 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 575,113 | 911,502 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,986 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.95" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,200 mAh | 5,700 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 44 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 65% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | HIOS 15 | Funtouch 15 |
| Major OS updates promised | 3 | 2 |
