- android.gs
- Compare
- Camon 40 vs RugOne Xever 7 Pro
Tecno Camon 40 vs UleFone RugOne Xever 7 Pro
What Camon 40 does better (5) and where RugOne Xever 7 Pro wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.4Display7.2
8.2Camera6.3
5.4Features8.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
Camon 40RugOne Xever 7 Pro
| Camon 40 | RugOne Xever 7 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.1 mm | 173.6 mm | −9.5 mm |
| Width | 74.6 mm | 84.4 mm | −9.8 mm |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm | 14.1 mm | −6.8 mm |
| Weight | 177 g | 325 g | −148 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Camon 40 better than RugOne Xever 7 Pro?
- Peak brightness1,300 nits vs 500 nits2.6×
- Optical stabilisationYes · RugOne Xever 7 Pro: No
- Weight177 g vs 325 g+83%
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · RugOne Xever 7 Pro: No
- Thickness7.3 mm vs 14.1 mm+93%
Why is RugOne Xever 7 Pro better than Camon 40?
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- 5GNo · Camon 40: Yes
- Battery capacity5,200 mAh vs 5,550 mAh+7%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 512 GB4×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx6 vs IPx8+33%
- Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 4 vs Wi-Fi 5+25%
- Main camera aperturef/1.9 vs f/1.8+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 177 g | 325 g |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm | 14.1 mm |
| Height | 164.1 mm | 173.6 mm |
| Width | 74.6 mm | 84.4 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | IP66 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx6 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Panda King Glass | Gorilla Glass |
| Colours | Emerald Lake Green, Galaxy Black, Glacier White, Emerald Glow Green | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.8″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,436 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,300 nits | 500 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.8% | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G100 Ultimate | Mediatek Dimensity 7025 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Mediatek |
| Process | 6 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | — |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | — |
| AnTuTu score | 575,113 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,986 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | — |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | — |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,200 mAh | 5,550 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 45 W | — |
| Charged in 30 min | 65% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | — |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Infrared port | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | HIOS 15 | — |
| Major OS updates promised | 3 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | A |
