- android.gs
- Compare
- Camon 20 Pro vs Camon 30 Pro
Tecno Camon 20 Pro vs Tecno Camon 30 Pro
What Camon 20 Pro does better (5) and where Camon 30 Pro wins (17) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.2Display9.5
4.4Performance7.4
6.4Camera9.1
6.0Battery7.2
4.2Features5.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Camon 20 ProCamon 30 Pro
| Camon 20 Pro | Camon 30 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.4 mm | 164 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Width | 76.7 mm | 74.5 mm | +2.2 mm |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 7.7 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 190 g | 189 g | +1 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Camon 20 Pro better than Camon 30 Pro?
- Stereo speakersYes · Camon 30 Pro: No
- Main camera64 MP vs 50 MP+28%
- Memory card slotYes · Camon 30 Pro: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Camon 30 Pro: No
- Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.9+12%
Why is Camon 30 Pro better than Camon 20 Pro?
- Wired charging33 W vs 70 W2.1×
- AnTuTu score574,290 vs 949,357+65%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)1,953 vs 3,9312×
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationNo · Camon 20 Pro: Yes
- 5GNo · Camon 20 Pro: Yes
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 3.1 GHz+41%
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
- Ultra-wide cameraNo · Camon 20 Pro: Yes
- Max video1080p vs 4K
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 190 g | 189 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 7.7 mm |
| Height | 163.4 mm | 164 mm |
| Width | 76.7 mm | 74.5 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP53 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx3 | — |
| Colours | Predawn Black, Serenity Blue | Iceland Basaltic Dark, Alps Snowy Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,436 px |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 500 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | — | 998 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.7% | 89.9% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 Ultimate |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| AnTuTu score | 574,290 | 949,357 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,953 | 3,931 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 1,727 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 14.5 h |
| Wired charging | 33 W | 70 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 38% | 64% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -25.5 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | HIOS 14 | HIOS 15 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 2 |
