- android.gs
- Compare
- Flip 2 vs Phantom V Flip2
TCL Flip 2 vs Tecno Phantom V Flip2
What Flip 2 does better (4) and where Phantom V Flip2 wins (24) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.0Display6.0
2.7Camera5.2
2.2Battery6.2
2.0Features4.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Flip 2Phantom V Flip2
| Flip 2 | Phantom V Flip2 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 107.3 mm | 170.8 mm | −63.5 mm |
| Width | 55.6 mm | 73.4 mm | −17.8 mm |
| Thickness | 19.9 mm | 7.6 mm | +12.3 mm |
| Weight | 140 g | 196 g | −56 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Flip 2 better than Phantom V Flip2?
- Weight140 g vs 196 g+40%
- Memory card slotYes · Phantom V Flip2: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Phantom V Flip2: No
- Loudspeaker loudness-19.5 LUFS vs -26.6 LUFS+-27%
Why is Phantom V Flip2 better than Flip 2?
- Battery capacity1,850 mAh vs 4,720 mAh2.6×
- RAM1 GB vs 8 GB8×
- Main camera2 MP vs 50 MP25×
- Wired charging5 W vs 70 W14×
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
- Pixel density143 ppi vs 413 ppi2.9×
- Storage (max)16 GB vs 256 GB16×
- Screen size2.8″ vs 6.9″2.5×
- OLED panelNo · Flip 2: Yes
- Optical stabilisationNo · Flip 2: Yes
- 5GNo · Flip 2: Yes
- NFCNo · Flip 2: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 140 g | 196 g |
| Thickness | 19.9 mm | 7.6 mm |
| Height | 107.3 mm | 170.8 mm |
| Width | 55.6 mm | 73.4 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Eco leather |
| Colours | Black, Blue | Travertine Green, Moondust Grey |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 2.8″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | TFT LCD | Foldable LTPO AMOLED |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 240 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 320 px | 2,640 px |
| Pixel density | 143 ppi | 413 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 330 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | — | 893 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 40.7% | 85.9% |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6739-CH | Mediatek Dimensity 8020 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 28 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 4 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 1.5 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8100 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 775,306 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,544 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 1,247 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 1 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 16 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 4 GB | 256 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 2 MP | 50 MP |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.57" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | — | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | — | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | — | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 1,850 mAh | 4,720 mAh |
| Active use (test) | — | 11.6 h |
| Wired charging | 5 W | 70 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 100% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | No | No |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -19.5 LUFS | -26.6 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | — | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity (incl. for accessories), compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.86 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 or KaiOS 3.1 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
