- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy S25 Ultra vs nubia Z80 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra vs ZTE nubia Z80 Ultra
What Galaxy S25 Ultra does better (11) and where nubia Z80 Ultra wins (13) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.1Display9.6
9.1Performance9.6
9.8Camera9.2
7.1Battery9.8
9.8Features9.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy S25 Ultranubia Z80 Ultra
| Galaxy S25 Ultra | nubia Z80 Ultra | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.8 mm | 164.5 mm | −1.7 mm |
| Width | 77.6 mm | 77.2 mm | +0.4 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8.6 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Weight | 218 g | 227 g | −9 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy S25 Ultra better than nubia Z80 Ultra?
- Main camera200 MP vs 50 MP4×
- Optical zoom5× vs 2.7×+85%
- Peak brightness2,600 nits vs 2,000 nits+30%
- 4K selfie videoYes · nubia Z80 Ultra: No
- eSIMYes · nubia Z80 Ultra: No
- Pixel density498 ppi vs 431 ppi+16%
- Weight218 g vs 227 g+4%
- Rear cameras4 vs 3+33%
- Resolution (width)1,440 px vs 1,216 px+18%
- Thickness8.2 mm vs 8.6 mm+5%
- Screen-to-body ratio92.5% vs 89.5%+3%
Why is nubia Z80 Ultra better than Galaxy S25 Ultra?
- Wired charging45 W vs 90 W2×
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 7,200 mAh+44%
- AnTuTu score2,207,809 vs 2,941,801+33%
- Active use (test)14.8 h vs 20.2 h+36%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)9,846 vs 10,971+11%
- Wireless charging power15 W vs 80 W5.3×
- Measured brightness1,417 nits vs 1,723 nits+22%
- 3DMark Wild Life Extreme6,687 vs 7,604+14%
- CPU frequency4.47 GHz vs 4.6 GHz+3%
- Selfie camera12 MP vs 16 MP+33%
- Charged in 30 min65% vs 73%+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 218 g | 227 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8.6 mm |
| Height | 162.8 mm | 164.5 mm |
| Width | 77.6 mm | 77.2 mm |
| Frame | Titanium | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Armor 2 | Unspecified |
| Colours | Titanium Silver Blue, Titanium Black, Titanium White Silver, Titanium Gray, Titanium Jade Green, Titanium Jet Black, Titanium Pink Gold | Black, White, Starry Night Blue, Luo Tian Yi Red |
| Stylus | Yes | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.9″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 1,440 px | 1,216 px |
| Resolution (height) | 3,120 px | 2,688 px |
| Pixel density | 498 ppi | 431 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2,600 nits | 2,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,417 nits | 1,723 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 92.5% | 89.5% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8750-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm SM8850-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 3 nm | 3 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 4.47 GHz | 4.6 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Adreno 840 |
| AnTuTu score | 2,207,809 | 2,941,801 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 9,846 | 10,971 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 6,687 | 7,604 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.3" | 1/1.3" |
| Rear cameras | 4 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 5× | 2.7× |
| Max video | 8K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 120 fps | 120 fps |
| Selfie camera | 12 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 7,200 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Si/C |
| Active use (test) | 14.8 h | 20.2 h |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 90 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 65% | 73% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | 15 W | 80 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 6 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Video output | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra Wideband | Yes | — |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -24.6 LUFS | -24.7 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display, ultrasonic | Under display, ultrasonic |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 1.25 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 9 | MyOS |
| Major OS updates promised | 7 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | B | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 2,000 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 45 h | — |
| Repairability class | C | — |
| Drop resistance class | A | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 UltravsSamsung Galaxy S26 Ultra9.59.6
vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 UltravsSamsung Galaxy S24 Ultra9.59.3
vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 UltravsXiaomi Poco F79.59.3
vs
Honor 400 ProvsSamsung Galaxy S25 Ultra9.59.5
vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 UltravsXiaomi Poco F7 Ultra9.59.4
vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 UltravsXiaomi 15T Pro9.59.7

