- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy S25 Ultra vs Poco F7 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra vs Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
What Galaxy S25 Ultra does better (17) and where Poco F7 Ultra wins (14) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.1Display9.1
9.1Performance9.2
9.8Camera9.2
7.1Battery8.4
9.8Features9.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy S25 UltraPoco F7 Ultra
| Galaxy S25 Ultra | Poco F7 Ultra | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.8 mm | 160.3 mm | +2.5 mm |
| Width | 77.6 mm | 75 mm | +2.6 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8.4 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Weight | 218 g | 212 g | +6 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy S25 Ultra better than Poco F7 Ultra?
- Main camera200 MP vs 50 MP4×
- Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Optical zoom5× vs 2.5×2×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)9,846 vs 8,887+11%
- Active use (test)14.8 h vs 13.5 h+10%
- 4K video frame rate120 fps vs 60 fps2×
- 4K selfie videoYes · Poco F7 Ultra: No
- eSIMYes · Poco F7 Ultra: No
- Battery charge cycles2,000 vs 1,0002×
- Drop resistance classA vs D
- 3DMark Wild Life Extreme6,687 vs 6,204+8%
- CPU frequency4.47 GHz vs 4.32 GHz+3%
Why is Poco F7 Ultra better than Galaxy S25 Ultra?
- Wired charging45 W vs 120 W2.7×
- AnTuTu score2,207,809 vs 2,580,520+17%
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 5,300 mAh+6%
- Selfie camera12 MP vs 32 MP2.7×
- Wireless charging power15 W vs 50 W3.3×
- Peak brightness2,600 nits vs 3,200 nits+23%
- Energy classB vs A
- Measured brightness1,417 nits vs 1,506 nits+6%
- Pixel density498 ppi vs 526 ppi+6%
- Weight218 g vs 212 g+3%
- Endurance per cycle45 h vs 63 h+40%
- Charged in 30 min65% vs 88%+35%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 218 g | 212 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8.4 mm |
| Height | 162.8 mm | 160.3 mm |
| Width | 77.6 mm | 75 mm |
| Frame | Titanium | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Armor 2 | Poco Shield Glass |
| Colours | Titanium Silver Blue, Titanium Black, Titanium White Silver, Titanium Gray, Titanium Jade Green, Titanium Jet Black, Titanium Pink Gold | Black, Yellow |
| Stylus | Yes | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.9″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 1,440 px | 1,440 px |
| Resolution (height) | 3,120 px | 3,200 px |
| Pixel density | 498 ppi | 526 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2,600 nits | 3,200 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,417 nits | 1,506 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 92.5% | 89.3% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8750-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 3 nm | 3 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 4.47 GHz | 4.32 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Adreno 830 |
| AnTuTu score | 2,207,809 | 2,580,520 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 9,846 | 8,887 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 6,687 | 6,204 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.6 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.3" | 1/1.55" |
| Rear cameras | 4 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 5× | 2.5× |
| Max video | 8K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 120 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 12 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,300 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Si/C |
| Active use (test) | 14.8 h | 13.5 h |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 120 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 65% | 88% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | 15 W | 50 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 6 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| Video output | Yes | — |
| Ultra Wideband | Yes | — |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -24.6 LUFS | -24.7 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display, ultrasonic | Under display, ultrasonic |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | 1.25 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 9 | HyperOS 3 |
| Major OS updates promised | 7 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | B | A |
| Battery charge cycles | 2,000 | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | 45 h | 63 h |
| Repairability class | C | C |
| Drop resistance class | A | D |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 UltravsSamsung Galaxy S26 Ultra9.59.6
vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 UltravsSamsung Galaxy S24 Ultra9.59.3
vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 UltravsXiaomi Poco F79.59.3
vs
Honor 400 ProvsSamsung Galaxy S25 Ultra9.59.5
vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 UltravsXiaomi 15T Pro9.59.7
vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 UltravsOPPO Reno149.59.4

