- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy S25 Ultra vs 15T Pro
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra vs Xiaomi 15T Pro
What Galaxy S25 Ultra does better (11) and where 15T Pro wins (15) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.1Display9.7
9.1Performance9.0
9.8Camera9.8
7.1Battery9.2
9.8Features9.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy S25 Ultra15T Pro
| Galaxy S25 Ultra | 15T Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.8 mm | 162.7 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Width | 77.6 mm | 77.9 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Weight | 218 g | 210 g | +8 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy S25 Ultra better than 15T Pro?
- Main camera200 MP vs 50 MP4×
- RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)9,846 vs 7,914+24%
- CPU frequency4.47 GHz vs 3.63 GHz+23%
- 3DMark Wild Life Extreme6,687 vs 5,887+14%
- Pixel density498 ppi vs 447 ppi+11%
- USB version3.2 vs 2+60%
- Rear cameras4 vs 3+33%
- Battery charge cycles2,000 vs 1,600+25%
- Resolution (width)1,440 px vs 1,280 px+12%
- Screen-to-body ratio92.5% vs 90.4%+2%
Why is 15T Pro better than Galaxy S25 Ultra?
- Wired charging45 W vs 90 W2×
- AnTuTu score2,207,809 vs 2,683,380+22%
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 5,500 mAh+10%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- Active use (test)14.8 h vs 16.4 h+11%
- Selfie camera12 MP vs 32 MP2.7×
- Wireless charging power15 W vs 50 W3.3×
- Peak brightness2,600 nits vs 3,200 nits+23%
- Energy classB vs A
- Weight218 g vs 210 g+4%
- Endurance per cycle45 h vs 58 h+29%
- Charged in 30 min65% vs 83%+28%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 218 g | 210 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 162.8 mm | 162.7 mm |
| Width | 77.6 mm | 77.9 mm |
| Frame | Titanium | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Armor 2 | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Colours | Titanium Silver Blue, Titanium Black, Titanium White Silver, Titanium Gray, Titanium Jade Green, Titanium Jet Black, Titanium Pink Gold | Black, Gray, Mocha Gold |
| Stylus | Yes | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.9″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 1,440 px | 1,280 px |
| Resolution (height) | 3,120 px | 2,772 px |
| Pixel density | 498 ppi | 447 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2,600 nits | 3,200 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,417 nits | 1,419 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 92.5% | 90.4% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8750-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite | Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 3 nm | 3 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 4.47 GHz | 3.63 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Immortalis-G925 |
| AnTuTu score | 2,207,809 | 2,683,380 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 9,846 | 7,914 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 6,687 | 5,887 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.6 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.3" | 1/1.31" |
| Rear cameras | 4 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 5× | 5× |
| Max video | 8K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 120 fps | 120 fps |
| Selfie camera | 12 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | 14.8 h | 16.4 h |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 90 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 65% | 83% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | 15 W | 50 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 6 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| Video output | Yes | — |
| Ultra Wideband | Yes | — |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -24.6 LUFS | -24.8 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display, ultrasonic | Under display |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 1.25 W/kg | 0.99 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 9 | HyperOS 3 |
| Major OS updates promised | 7 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | B | A |
| Battery charge cycles | 2,000 | 1,600 |
| Endurance per cycle | 45 h | 58 h |
| Repairability class | C | C |
| Drop resistance class | A | A |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 UltravsSamsung Galaxy S26 Ultra9.59.6vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 UltravsSamsung Galaxy S24 Ultra9.59.3vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 UltravsXiaomi Poco F79.59.3
vsHonor 400 ProvsSamsung Galaxy S25 Ultra9.59.5vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 UltravsXiaomi Poco F7 Ultra9.59.4vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 UltravsOPPO Reno149.59.4