- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy S25 Ultra vs nubia RedMagic 10S Pro
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra vs ZTE nubia RedMagic 10S Pro
What Galaxy S25 Ultra does better (16) and where nubia RedMagic 10S Pro wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.1Display9.7
9.8Camera8.9
7.1Battery9.3
9.8Features7.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy S25 Ultranubia RedMagic 10S Pro
| Galaxy S25 Ultra | nubia RedMagic 10S Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.8 mm | 163.4 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Width | 77.6 mm | 76.1 mm | +1.5 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8.9 mm | −0.7 mm |
| Weight | 218 g | 229 g | −11 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy S25 Ultra better than nubia RedMagic 10S Pro?
- Main camera200 MP vs 50 MP4×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx42×
- Telephoto cameraYes · nubia RedMagic 10S Pro: No
- Wireless chargingYes · nubia RedMagic 10S Pro: No
- Peak brightness2,600 nits vs 2,000 nits+30%
- Rear cameras4 vs 22×
- 4K video frame rate120 fps vs 60 fps2×
- 4K selfie videoYes · nubia RedMagic 10S Pro: No
- eSIMYes · nubia RedMagic 10S Pro: No
- Drop resistance classA vs C
- Pixel density498 ppi vs 431 ppi+16%
- Weight218 g vs 229 g+5%
Why is nubia RedMagic 10S Pro better than Galaxy S25 Ultra?
- Wired charging45 W vs 80 W+78%
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 7,050 mAh+41%
- RAM16 GB vs 24 GB+50%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Galaxy S25 Ultra: Yes
- Energy classB vs A
- Endurance per cycle45 h vs 80 h+79%
- Selfie camera12 MP vs 16 MP+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 218 g | 229 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8.9 mm |
| Height | 162.8 mm | 163.4 mm |
| Width | 77.6 mm | 76.1 mm |
| Frame | Titanium | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Armor 2 | Corning Gorilla Glass (unspecified version) |
| Colours | Titanium Silver Blue, Titanium Black, Titanium White Silver, Titanium Gray, Titanium Jade Green, Titanium Jet Black, Titanium Pink Gold | Nightfall (Matt Black), Moonlight (Silver Transparent), Dusk (Black Transparent) |
| Stylus | Yes | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.9″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 1,440 px | 1,216 px |
| Resolution (height) | 3,120 px | 2,688 px |
| Pixel density | 498 ppi | 431 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2,600 nits | 2,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,417 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 92.5% | 91.4% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8750-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm SM8750-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 3 nm | 3 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 4.47 GHz | 4.47 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Adreno 830 |
| AnTuTu score | 2,207,809 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 9,846 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 6,687 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 24 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.3" | 1/1.55" |
| Rear cameras | 4 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 5× | — |
| Max video | 8K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 120 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 12 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 7,050 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Si/C |
| Active use (test) | 14.8 h | — |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 80 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 65% | — |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 15 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 | USB Type-C 3.2 Gen 2 |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Video output | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra Wideband | Yes | — |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -24.6 LUFS | -24.5 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display, ultrasonic | Under display |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 1.25 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 9 | — |
| Major OS updates promised | 7 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | B | A |
| Battery charge cycles | 2,000 | 1,200 |
| Endurance per cycle | 45 h | 80 h |
| Repairability class | C | C |
| Drop resistance class | A | C |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 UltravsSamsung Galaxy S26 Ultra9.59.6vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 UltravsSamsung Galaxy S24 Ultra9.59.3vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 UltravsXiaomi Poco F79.59.3
vsHonor 400 ProvsSamsung Galaxy S25 Ultra9.59.5vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 UltravsXiaomi Poco F7 Ultra9.59.4vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 UltravsXiaomi 15T Pro9.59.7