- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy S25 Ultra vs Redmi Note 9 Pro
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
What Galaxy S25 Ultra does better (35) and where Redmi Note 9 Pro wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.1Display4.2
9.1Performance3.2
9.8Camera7.2
7.1Battery6.8
9.8Features5.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy S25 UltraRedmi Note 9 Pro
| Galaxy S25 Ultra | Redmi Note 9 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.8 mm | 165.8 mm | −3 mm |
| Width | 77.6 mm | 76.7 mm | +0.9 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8.8 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Weight | 218 g | 209 g | +9 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy S25 Ultra better than Redmi Note 9 Pro?
- AnTuTu score2,207,809 vs 279,6257.9×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)9,846 vs 1,7855.5×
- Main camera200 MP vs 64 MP3.1×
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 60 Hz2×
- RAM16 GB vs 8 GB2×
- Peak brightness2,600 nits vs 450 nits5.8×
- 3DMark Wild Life Extreme6,687 vs 31521.2×
- Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 128 GB8×
- Measured brightness1,417 nits vs 614 nits2.3×
- Wired charging45 W vs 30 W+50%
- OLED panelYes · Redmi Note 9 Pro: No
- Optical stabilisationYes · Redmi Note 9 Pro: No
Why is Redmi Note 9 Pro better than Galaxy S25 Ultra?
- Memory card slotNo · Galaxy S25 Ultra: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Galaxy S25 Ultra: Yes
- Weight218 g vs 209 g+4%
- Selfie camera12 MP vs 16 MP+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 218 g | 209 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8.8 mm |
| Height | 162.8 mm | 165.8 mm |
| Width | 77.6 mm | 76.7 mm |
| Frame | Titanium | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Armor 2 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Titanium Silver Blue, Titanium Black, Titanium White Silver, Titanium Gray, Titanium Jade Green, Titanium Jet Black, Titanium Pink Gold | Tropical Green, Glacier White, Interstellar Gray |
| Stylus | Yes | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.9″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 1,440 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 3,120 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 498 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2,600 nits | 450 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,417 nits | 614 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 92.5% | 84.5% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8750-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 3 nm | 8 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 4.47 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Adreno 618 |
| AnTuTu score | 2,207,809 | 279,625 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 9,846 | 1,785 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 6,687 | 315 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 200 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.3" | 1/1.72" |
| Rear cameras | 4 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 5× | — |
| Max video | 8K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 120 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 12 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,020 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | 14.8 h | — |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 30 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 65% | 50% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 15 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| Video output | Yes | — |
| Ultra Wideband | Yes | — |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -24.6 LUFS | -28.6 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display, ultrasonic | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 1.25 W/kg | 0.66 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 9 | MIUI 11 |
| Major OS updates promised | 7 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | B | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 2,000 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 45 h | — |
| Repairability class | C | — |
| Drop resistance class | A | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 UltravsSamsung Galaxy S26 Ultra9.59.6vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 UltravsSamsung Galaxy S24 Ultra9.59.3vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 UltravsXiaomi Poco F79.59.3
vsHonor 400 ProvsSamsung Galaxy S25 Ultra9.59.5vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 UltravsXiaomi Poco F7 Ultra9.59.4vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 UltravsXiaomi 15T Pro9.59.7