- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy S25 Ultra vs Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China)
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China)
What Galaxy S25 Ultra does better (15) and where Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China) wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.1Display9.4
9.8Camera8.6
7.1Battery9.4
9.8Features8.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy S25 UltraRedmi Note 15 Pro+ (China)
| Galaxy S25 Ultra | Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.8 mm | 163.3 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Width | 77.6 mm | 78.3 mm | −0.7 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 7.9 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Weight | 218 g | 211 g | +7 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy S25 Ultra better than Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China)?
- Main camera200 MP vs 50 MP4×
- Optical zoom5× vs 2.5×2×
- Wireless chargingYes · Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China): No
- CPU frequency4.47 GHz vs 2.7 GHz+66%
- 4K video frame rate120 fps vs 30 fps4×
- Max video8K vs 4K
- 4K selfie videoYes · Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China): No
- eSIMYes · Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China): No
- Pixel density498 ppi vs 443 ppi+12%
- USB version3.2 vs 2+60%
- Process3 nm vs 4 nm+33%
- Rear cameras4 vs 3+33%
Why is Redmi Note 15 Pro+ (China) better than Galaxy S25 Ultra?
- Wired charging45 W vs 90 W2×
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 7,000 mAh+40%
- Selfie camera12 MP vs 32 MP2.7×
- Peak brightness2,600 nits vs 3,200 nits+23%
- Weight218 g vs 211 g+3%
- Main camera aperturef/1.7 vs f/1.6+6%
- Thickness8.2 mm vs 7.9 mm+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 218 g | 211 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 7.9 mm |
| Height | 162.8 mm | 163.3 mm |
| Width | 77.6 mm | 78.3 mm |
| Frame | Titanium | — |
| Back | Glass | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Armor 2 | Xiaomi Dragon Crystal Glass |
| Colours | Titanium Silver Blue, Titanium Black, Titanium White Silver, Titanium Gray, Titanium Jade Green, Titanium Jet Black, Titanium Pink Gold | Black, Purple, Blue, White |
| Stylus | Yes | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.9″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 1,440 px | 1,220 px |
| Resolution (height) | 3,120 px | 2,772 px |
| Pixel density | 498 ppi | 443 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2,600 nits | 3,200 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,417 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 92.5% | 86.8% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8750-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm SM7635-AC Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 4.47 GHz | 2.7 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Adreno 810 |
| AnTuTu score | 2,207,809 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 9,846 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 6,687 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.6 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.3" | 1/1.55" |
| Rear cameras | 4 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 5× | 2.5× |
| Max video | 8K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 120 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 12 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 7,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Active use (test) | 14.8 h | — |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 90 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 65% | — |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 15 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| Video output | Yes | — |
| Ultra Wideband | Yes | — |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -24.6 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display, ultrasonic | Under display |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity |
| SAR (head) | 1.25 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 9 | HyperOS 2 |
| Major OS updates promised | 7 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | B | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 2,000 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 45 h | — |
| Repairability class | C | — |
| Drop resistance class | A | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 UltravsSamsung Galaxy S26 Ultra9.59.6
vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 UltravsSamsung Galaxy S24 Ultra9.59.3
vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 UltravsXiaomi Poco F79.59.3
vs
Honor 400 ProvsSamsung Galaxy S25 Ultra9.59.5
vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 UltravsXiaomi Poco F7 Ultra9.59.4
vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 UltravsXiaomi 15T Pro9.59.7

