- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy S25 Ultra vs Redmi Note 12 Pro
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro
What Galaxy S25 Ultra does better (30) and where Redmi Note 12 Pro wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.1Display7.5
9.1Performance4.9
9.8Camera8.1
7.1Battery5.5
9.8Features5.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy S25 UltraRedmi Note 12 Pro
| Galaxy S25 Ultra | Redmi Note 12 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.8 mm | 163 mm | −0.2 mm |
| Width | 77.6 mm | 76 mm | +1.6 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Weight | 218 g | 187 g | +31 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy S25 Ultra better than Redmi Note 12 Pro?
- AnTuTu score2,207,809 vs 490,5264.5×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)9,846 vs 2,2094.5×
- Main camera200 MP vs 50 MP4×
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx32.7×
- Peak brightness2,600 nits vs 900 nits2.9×
- 3DMark Wild Life Extreme6,687 vs 62910.6×
- Storage (max)1,024 GB vs 256 GB4×
- Major OS updates promised7 vs 23.5×
- Telephoto cameraYes · Redmi Note 12 Pro: No
- Wireless chargingYes · Redmi Note 12 Pro: No
- RAM16 GB vs 12 GB+33%
- CPU frequency4.47 GHz vs 2.6 GHz+72%
Why is Redmi Note 12 Pro better than Galaxy S25 Ultra?
- Wired charging45 W vs 67 W+49%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Galaxy S25 Ultra: Yes
- Weight218 g vs 187 g+17%
- Charged in 30 min65% vs 100%+54%
- Selfie camera12 MP vs 16 MP+33%
- Thickness8.2 mm vs 8 mm+2%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 218 g | 187 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 162.8 mm | 163 mm |
| Width | 77.6 mm | 76 mm |
| Frame | Titanium | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Armor 2 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Titanium Silver Blue, Titanium Black, Titanium White Silver, Titanium Gray, Titanium Jade Green, Titanium Jet Black, Titanium Pink Gold | Frosted Blue (Sky Blue), Onyx Black (Midnight Black), Polar White, Stardust Purple |
| Stylus | Yes | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.9″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 1,440 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 3,120 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 498 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2,600 nits | 900 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,417 nits | 890 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 92.5% | 86.7% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8750-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 3 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 4.47 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| AnTuTu score | 2,207,809 | 490,526 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 9,846 | 2,209 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 6,687 | 629 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.3" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 4 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 5× | — |
| Max video | 8K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 120 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 12 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | 14.8 h | 12.1 h |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 67 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 65% | 100% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging power | 15 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| Video output | Yes | — |
| Ultra Wideband | Yes | — |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -24.6 LUFS | -26.6 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display, ultrasonic | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 1.25 W/kg | 0.99 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 9 | MIUI 13 |
| Major OS updates promised | 7 | 2 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | B | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 2,000 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 45 h | — |
| Repairability class | C | — |
| Drop resistance class | A | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 UltravsSamsung Galaxy S26 Ultra9.59.6
vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 UltravsSamsung Galaxy S24 Ultra9.59.3
vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 UltravsXiaomi Poco F79.59.3
vs
Honor 400 ProvsSamsung Galaxy S25 Ultra9.59.5
vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 UltravsXiaomi Poco F7 Ultra9.59.4
vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 UltravsXiaomi 15T Pro9.59.7

