- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy S25 Ultra vs 17 Pro
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra vs Xiaomi 17 Pro
What Galaxy S25 Ultra does better (8) and where 17 Pro wins (12) — every spec side by side.
vs
9.1Display8.8
9.1Performance9.7
9.8Camera9.8
7.1Battery9.6
9.8Features8.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy S25 Ultra17 Pro
| Galaxy S25 Ultra | 17 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.8 mm | 151.1 mm | +11.7 mm |
| Width | 77.6 mm | 71.8 mm | +5.8 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Weight | 218 g | 192 g | +26 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy S25 Ultra better than 17 Pro?
- Main camera200 MP vs 50 MP4×
- Measured brightness1,417 nits vs 1,043 nits+36%
- eSIMYes · 17 Pro: No
- Screen size6.9″ vs 6.3″+10%
- Pixel density498 ppi vs 464 ppi+7%
- Rear cameras4 vs 3+33%
- Resolution (width)1,440 px vs 1,220 px+18%
- Screen-to-body ratio92.5% vs 89.5%+3%
Why is 17 Pro better than Galaxy S25 Ultra?
- Wired charging45 W vs 100 W2.2×
- AnTuTu score2,207,809 vs 3,569,354+62%
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 6,300 mAh+26%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 160 Hz+33%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)9,846 vs 12,033+22%
- Selfie camera12 MP vs 50 MP4.2×
- Wireless charging power15 W vs 50 W3.3×
- Peak brightness2,600 nits vs 3,500 nits+35%
- Weight218 g vs 192 g+14%
- CPU frequency4.47 GHz vs 4.6 GHz+3%
- Charged in 30 min65% vs 70%+8%
- Thickness8.2 mm vs 8 mm+2%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 218 g | 192 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 162.8 mm | 151.1 mm |
| Width | 77.6 mm | 71.8 mm |
| Frame | Titanium | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Armor 2 | Xiaomi Dragon Crystal Glass |
| Colours | Titanium Silver Blue, Titanium Black, Titanium White Silver, Titanium Gray, Titanium Jade Green, Titanium Jet Black, Titanium Pink Gold | Black, White, Purple, Green |
| Stylus | Yes | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.9″ | 6.3″ |
| Panel | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X | LTPO AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| LTPO (adaptive 1–120 Hz) | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,440 px | 1,220 px |
| Resolution (height) | 3,120 px | 2,656 px |
| Pixel density | 498 ppi | 464 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 160 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2,600 nits | 3,500 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,417 nits | 1,043 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 92.5% | 89.5% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8750-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm SM8850-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 3 nm | 3 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 4.47 GHz | 4.6 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Adreno 840 |
| AnTuTu score | 2,207,809 | 3,569,354 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 9,846 | 12,033 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 6,687 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 1,024 GB | 1,024 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory card slot | No | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.3" | 1/1.28" |
| Rear cameras | 4 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | Yes |
| Optical zoom | 5× | 5× |
| Max video | 8K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 120 fps | 120 fps |
| Selfie camera | 12 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,300 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Si/C |
| Active use (test) | 14.8 h | — |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 100 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 65% | 70% |
| Wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | 15 W | 50 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Video output | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra Wideband | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -24.6 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display, ultrasonic | Under display, ultrasonic |
| Barometer | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, barometer |
| SAR (head) | 1.25 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 9 | HyperOS 3 |
| Major OS updates promised | 7 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | B | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 2,000 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 45 h | — |
| Repairability class | C | — |
| Drop resistance class | A | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 UltravsSamsung Galaxy S26 Ultra9.59.6
vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 UltravsSamsung Galaxy S24 Ultra9.59.3
vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 UltravsXiaomi Poco F79.59.3
vs
Honor 400 ProvsSamsung Galaxy S25 Ultra9.59.5
vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 UltravsXiaomi Poco F7 Ultra9.59.4
vs
Samsung Galaxy S25 UltravsXiaomi 15T Pro9.59.7

