- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy M52 5G vs iQOO Neo5 SE
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G vs Vivo iQOO Neo5 SE
What Galaxy M52 5G does better (9) and where iQOO Neo5 SE wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.8Display6.9
7.5Camera6.8
5.3Battery5.1
7.9Features8.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy M52 5GiQOO Neo5 SE
| Galaxy M52 5G | iQOO Neo5 SE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.2 mm | 164.7 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 76.7 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm | 8.5 mm | −1.1 mm |
| Weight | 173 g | 189 g | −16 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy M52 5G better than iQOO Neo5 SE?
- OLED panelYes · iQOO Neo5 SE: No
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 4,500 mAh+11%
- Main camera64 MP vs 50 MP+28%
- Memory card slotYes · iQOO Neo5 SE: No
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
- 4K selfie videoYes · iQOO Neo5 SE: No
- Weight173 g vs 189 g+9%
- Process6 nm vs 7 nm+17%
- Thickness7.4 mm vs 8.5 mm+15%
Why is iQOO Neo5 SE better than Galaxy M52 5G?
- Wired charging25 W vs 55 W2.2×
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Stereo speakersNo · Galaxy M52 5G: Yes
- Peak brightness400 nits vs 650 nits+62%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 3.2 GHz+33%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Galaxy M52 5G: Yes
- Bluetooth5 vs 5.2+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 173 g | 189 g |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm | 8.5 mm |
| Height | 164.2 mm | 164.7 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 76.7 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | — |
| Colours | Icy Blue, Blazing Black, White | Black, White, Aurora |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 400 nits | 650 nits |
| Measured brightness | 777 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.4% | 85% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Adreno 650 |
| AnTuTu score | 504,424 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,796 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 679 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.97" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | — |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 55 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 30% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -30 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.79 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 5.1 | OriginOS Ocean |
